|
who is this mysterious Son of Man?
No lie can live forever. -Alfred North Whitehead
The Son of Man in the Gospels can be traced to the constellation Orion which represents Jesus' Spirit. Background for this report can be found in Gospel Zodiac, Jesus' Ghost and Pillar of Cloud. They explain how Jesus allegorizes the sun, the nature of Jesus' Spirit and the role the Milky Way plays in apocalyptic prophecies. This report explains the astrological significance of Son of Man.
Introduction
One of the imperatives in Christian mythology is the belief that the world as we know it will end someday. God will overthrow the forces of evil and all who side with them, and only those who repent and follow Jesus' teachings will be allowed to enter the new Kingdom of God. Jesus and Paul mention it often and the Book of Revelation is devoted to it.
Many passages attest that Jesus expected the end of the world to come in his time, not thousands of years later. Throughout the Gospels, Jesus refers to some mysterious Son of man, a cosmic judge sent from heaven who would destroy whoever opposes God and reward those who are faithful.
Who this Son of man? The popular claim has it that Jesus was referring to himself in the third person. It's plausible because many passages fit the course of Jesus' ministry. What is suspicious about this rationale is that Jesus appears to be describing someone else.
38For whoever is ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him will the Son of man also be ashamed, when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels." 1And he said to them, "Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they see that the kingdom of God has come with power." (Mark 8:38-9:1)
I submit that Christian reasoning is entirely wrong. When Christians read the predictions of the end of the world, they are waiting for events to unfold on earth. Even after 2,000 years of false alarms, they have not lost patience, and I don't know if they will ever admit that maybe they are misreading the New Testament.
Such a calamity cannot happen as the Bible predicts. Something on that scale would take an event like a large meteor to hit earth. In such a case, a meteor would not care who is faithful to Jesus. If there was a nuclear war, bombs would be guided by human stupidity, not divine intelligence. If any other catastrophe happens on that scale, earth would not be a very pleasant place for the survivors. Whatever the cause of mass destruction, faith will not protect anybody. Even worse, if the entire world was destroyed, as devout Christians believe, there would be no survivors.
What confuses modern readers is the way the Bible's writers coded their belief in the power of the stars as if they affected life on earth. The matter before us is to decipher their writings for what they meant to ancients, not to what modern believers want to believe.
For this reason, we will examine the Bible from an astronomical point of view. It was a time when ancients perceived the stars in heaven as patterns to be interpreted as God's divine plan for life on earth. The sun was especially important to them because they understood that life on earth depended on it.
There are three clues which clarify what they were writing about. The first describes the Son of man as the constellation Orion. The second relates the yearly sun cycle to the end of the world. The third tracks Orion with the sun cycle. There can be no other conclusion except that the idea of a supernatural God was conceived as a ruse to mislead faithful Christians.
The Son of man
Three passages define the Son of man in physical form.
The first appears in the apocalyptic writings of the Book of Daniel, where Daniel describes the Son of man as riding on the clouds of heaven to the "Ancient of days" to give him everlasting dominion over the new kingdom of heaven.
13I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. 14And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed. (Dan. 7:13-14)
Revelation's description of the Son of man fits the pattern of stars in the constellation Orion. The star on his right shoulder is bright red (upper left star). The three stars at his waste were later seen as the three wise men who announced the birth of Jesus.
12Then I turned to see the voice that was speaking to me, and on turning I saw seven golden lampstands, 13and in the midst of the lampstands one like a son of man, clothed with a long robe and with a golden girdle round his breast; 14his head and his hair were white as white wool, white as snow; his eyes were like a flame of fire, 15his feet were like burnished bronze, refined as in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of many waters; 16in his right hand he held seven stars, from his mouth issued a sharp two-edged sword, and his face was like the sun shining in full strength. (Rev. 1:12-20)
The Son of man has a cluster of stars in the background that look like the clouds upon which the Son of man rides. Astronomical maps show the Milky Way behind the constellation Orion. From earth, they look like clouds.
14And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle. (Rev. 14:14-20)
A photograph of Orion, personified as the Son of man riding on a cloud.
Orion as seen in human form. His right hand could be holding a sickle or a club. His left hand could be holding an animal skin, a shield or a bow. The Milky Way is behind him. The arc above him represents the sun's path. The line going through his waste is the celestial equator which runs parallel to earth's equator.
Orion's legacy
After the Big Dipper, Orion is perhaps the next most celebrated constellation in the winter sky. Mythologies about Orion probably originated from the Egyptians thousands of years ago and extended to the Greeks at the turn of the first century. It is a very important constellation to astral religions and easy to recognize.
To the ancient Egyptians, Orion was Osiris the God of Light. Set was Orisis' brother and the God of Darkness. According to legend, Orisis was murdered by his evil brother Set, who tore his body into pieces and scattered the fragments. Isis, Osiris' wife, managed to put him back together except for his phallus, which had been swallowed by a fish. She made an artificial phallus and breathed into his body to restore his soul. Thereafter, he rose to the sky.
In one period, Orion represented the Egyptian god of the dead and the first king of Egypt. After death, the pharaoh was thought to mystically inseminate the stars to ensure that, through Osiris, Horus the sun god would be reborn as his successor.
In one Greek myth, Orion was the son of Neptune and the nymph Euryale. He was of gigantic size, strength and beauty. He was so tall that he could walk through deep water without wetting his head. His hubris invoked Gaia, the Goddess of the Earth to send a scorpion to kill him. His fall to earth can be seen when the stars of Orion sink defeated below the western horizon and the stars of Scorpion are just rising in the east.
The next night he rises again, saved by Ophiuchus, the Doctor of Antiquity who gave him an antidote for the scorpions poison. This can be seen when the Scorpion sets in the southwest with Ophiuchus standing over him as a symbol of the antidote. Later, when Ophiuchus sets in the west, Orion comes up from the east, fully recovered.
In these myths alone we see fragments of Christian mythology. Gods die and are restored to life. They are given a soul by being breathed into and they fall to earth as Adam did. The scorpion brings death as Judas did to Jesus. There is the eternal conflict between light and dark. (See Light verses Dark)
The timing of Orion's cycle fits with the birth of Jesus on December 25. It makes its first appearance in the east in mid December each year. And as the season progresses, Orion rises with the sun and sets in the west three days before it rises in the east again.
With the sun personified as Jesus, it is accurate to think of Orion as a constellation in synch with the sun's cycle. In a sense they are like conjoined twins who suffer the same fate. This is why the confusion about whether Jesus is referring to himself as the Son of Man in the third person or whether the Son of Man is some cosmic judge.
The sun cycle
In allegorical language, the sun goes through four seasonal cycles. It is born on December 25 when daylight hours start to increase. At about this same time Orion rises in the east with its three belt stars as the three wise men. As Orion rises, the star Sirius ascends above the horizon as the star of Bethlehem. Sirius is the brightest star in the sky.
The powers of darkness are still in power, but as the daylight hours increase, it is seen as overcoming the forces that try to stop it. In the Gospels, this is when Jesus is born and when his parents take him away to keep Herod from killing him.
At the spring equinox it has entered the gates of heaven when daylight hours start to emerge more powerful than the dark evil forces. Jesus' mission starts in the spring when he collects his disciples and builds a following.
At the summer solstice, when the sun is the highest in the sky, the sun is on its throne. In the following summer months, as the sun descends, it is still strong, but it is weakening as the dark forces start to make war against it. To show his strength, Jesus performs miracles and exorcises demons. At this time Orion is at the height of its ascent.
When the sun passes through the fall equinox, it enters the gates to hell. Night time hours start to lengthen and the dark forces are said to be fighting their way back to power. The sun continues to weaken until it dies for three days following December 21. This is when Jesus is betrayed by Judas and is taken to trial and executed. Allegorically, this is the end of the world.
On December 25, the sun is resurrected and the cycle repeats.
This cycle is not unique to Christianity; it plays out through the mythologies of resurrected gods. It was the age of fable when the constellations were assigned the names of gods. There was Hercules who died on his twelfth labor like Jesus. There is Jason and the Argonauts with their ship Argo, reminiscent of Noah's ark. The constellation Perseus holding the head of Medusa looks like David holding the head of Goliath. There are creation myths, supreme gods who mate with virgins, giants, serpents and a host of other characters like those in the Bible.
The Bible cannot be understood by those who are so blinded with faith that they keep their heads buried in the ground trying to make historical sense out of it. Look up to the sky. The keys to unlocking the secrets of the Bible can be found with a map of the constellations and a good book on star mythology. My favorite is New Patterns in the Sky New Patterns in the Sky by Julius D. W. Staal,
The Zodiac wheel shows how the sun's yearly ascension and descension conforms to the Bible's motifs.
biblical Omens
In Mark chapter 13, there is an allegorical summary of the astronomical omens that lead to the end of the world. They start when the sun is at full power at its highest position on the horizon to when it descends to its death at the lowest position.
1. When the sun is at the summer solstice in Gemini, Jesus predicted that some day the temple will be destroyed. His disciples wanted to know what sign they should look for to know when this event will happen. In biblespeak, "sign" denotes astrological signs.
1And as he came out of the temple, one of his disciples said to him, "Look, Teacher, what wonderful stones and what wonderful buildings!" 2And Jesus said to him, "Do you see these great buildings? There will not be left here one stone upon another, that will not be thrown down." 3And as he sat on the Mount of Olives opposite the temple, Peter and James and John and Andrew asked him privately, 4"Tell us, when will this be, and what will be the sign when these things are all to be accomplished?" (Mark 13:1-4)
2. After the sun passes the high point of the summer solstice it descends lower with each passing day. Allegorically, the sun is weakening because the dark forces of evil are said to waging war against it. The wars are just beginning.
The sun starts to descend in the house of Cancer. It is usually a time of hesitation, so Jesus warns what to expect and not to be alarmed.
7And when you hear of wars and rumors of wars, do not be alarmed; this must take place, but the end is not yet. 8For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; there will be earthquakes in various places, there will be famines; this is but the beginning of the birth-pangs. 9"But take heed to yourselves; for they will deliver you up to councils; and you will be beaten in synagogues; and you will stand before governors and kings for my sake, to bear testimony before them. (Mark 13:7-8)
3. The wars between light and dark intensify as the days get shorter. The sun is still strong, but the forces of evil are gaining power.
The house of Leo brings strength from the new harvest. So Jesus says to be strong against adversity and you will be saved.
11And when they bring you to trial and deliver you up, do not be anxious beforehand what you are to say; but say whatever is given you in that hour, for it is not you who speak, but the Holy Spirit. 12And brother will deliver up brother to death, and the father his child, and children will rise against parents and have them put to death; 13and you will be hated by all for my name's sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved. 14"But when you see the desolating sacrilege set up where it ought not to be (let the reader understand), then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains; (Mark 13:11-14)
4. Virgo is the last house before the sun descends into hell-Virgo is described as a nursing mother. There is no turning back.
15let him who is on the housetop not go down, nor enter his house, to take anything away; 16and let him who is in the field not turn back to take his mantle. 17And alas for those who are with child and for those who give suck [Virgo] in those days! (Mark 13:15-17)
5. The sun has passed the fall equinox into Scorpio. The days are getting progressively shorter than the nights. According to Jesus, if the days did not get shorter, no one could be saved, so God shortened the days. Pray that the sign doesn't happen in winter because it is the worst of times. If the days are still getting shorter and someone says the Christ has come, do not believe them. It is not the right time.
18Pray that it may not happen in winter. 19For in those days there will be such tribulation as has not been from the beginning of the creation which God created until now, and never will be. 20And if the Lord had not shortened the days, no human being would be saved; but for the sake of the elect, whom he chose, he shortened the days. 21And then if any one says to you, 'Look, here is the Christ!' or 'Look, there he is!' do not believe it. 22False Christs and false prophets will arise and show signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, the elect. 23But take heed; I have told you all things beforehand. (Mark 13:18-23)
6. The sun is in Sagittarius as the sun descends to its lowest point on the horizon. On the darkest days of the winter when the moon does not give light, the Son of man will come in clouds. The Son of man in clouds can be seen in the picture above. Below, the next frame shows the son of men descending on December 21.
24"But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, 25and the stars will be falling from heaven, and the powers in the heavens will be shaken. 26And then they will see the Son of man coming in clouds with great power and glory. 27And then he will send out the angels, and gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of heaven. (Mark 13:24-27)
7. You will know he is near the gates to heaven (the spring equinox) when fig trees start to grow leaves.
28"From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near. 29So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that he is near, at the very gates. (Mark 13:28-29)
8. This generation will see these things take place. -He means his generation.
30Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away before all these things take place. 31Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. (Mark 13:30-31)
In the first century on December 21 at midnight, when the sun is darkened and the moon does not give up its light, the Son of man can be seen descending to earth. A month later it disappears from view.
Orion ascends in the east three days after its disappearance in the west.
|
|
|
|
As the grandson of rebellious Ham and nephew of the cursed Canaan, Nimrod became the archetypal Child worshipped on the lap of the goddess mother, who was known under different appellations in various cultures as Isis, Nana, Eve, Istar, Demeter, Hecate, Themis, Hera, Astraea, Diana, Cybele, Fortuna, Erigone, Sibylla and the Virgin Mother. According to Hislop, the godly sons of Noah, Shem and Japeth, designated Nimrod an 'apostate' after he 'liberated' mankind from the fear and worship of the true God:
"Thus from Assyria, Egypt, and Greece, we have cumulative and overwhelming evidence, all conspiring to demonstrate that the child worshipped in the arms of the goddess-mother in all these countries in the very character of Ninus or Nin, 'The Son,' was Nimrod, the son of Cush. A feature here, or an incident there, may have been borrowed from some succeeding hero; but it seems impossible to doubt, that of that child Nimrod was the prototype, the grand original.
"The amazing extent of the worship of this man indicates something very extraordinary in his character; and there is ample reason to believe, that in his own day he was an object of high popularity. Though by setting up as king, Nimrod invaded the patriarchal system, and abridged the liberties of mankind, yet he was held by many to have conferred benefits upon them, that amply indemnified them for the loss of their liberties, and covered him with glory and renown...
He is said to have been the first that gathered mankind into communities, the first of mortals that reigned, and the first that offered idolatrous sacrifices. This character can agree with none but that of Nimrod. Now the name given to him in connection with his 'gathering men together,' and offering idolatrous sacrifice, is very significant.
Phoroneus, in one of its meanings, and that one of the most natural, signifies the 'Apostate.' * That name had very likely been given him by the uninfected portion of the sons of Noah. But that name had also another meaning, that is, 'to set free'; and therefore his own adherents adopted it, and glorified the great 'Apostate' from the primeval faith, though he was the first that abridged the liberties of mankind, as the grand "Emancipator!" ** And hence, in one form or other, this title was handed down to this deified successors as a title of honour.***
* From Pharo, also pronounced Pharang, or Pharong, 'to cast off, to make naked, to apostatise, to set free.' These meanings are not commonly given in this order, but as the sense of 'casting off' explains all the other meanings, that warrants the conclusion that 'to cast off' is the generic sense of the word. Now 'apostacy' is very near akin to this sense, and therefore is one of the most natural...
"All tradition from the earliest times bears testimony to the apostacy of Nimrod, and to his success in leading men away from the patriarchal faith, and delivering their minds from that awe of God and fear of the judgments of heaven that must have rested on them while yet the memory of the flood was recent. And according to all the principles of depraved human nature, this too, no doubt, was one grand element in his fame; for men will readily rally around any one who can give the least appearance of plausibility to any doctrine which will teach that they can be assured of happiness and heaven at last, though their hearts and natures are unchanged, and though they live without God in the world. How great was the boon conferred by Nimrod on the human race, in the estimation of ungodly men, by emancipating them from the impressions of true religion..." (156:51-2)
Although Nimrod [aka Orion/Saturn/Tammuz] was a hunter of men, his religious system was based on a deceptive assurances of salvation without any provision for the fundamental problem of sin. As a type of the Antichrist who will soon be revealed, this false messiah was able to draw the multitudes into his one world religion; as Hislop stated, "men will readily rally around any one who can give the least appearance of plausibility to any doctrine which will teach that they can be assured of happiness and heaven at last, though their hearts and natures are unchanged".
Because with lies ye have...strengthened the hands of the wicked, that he should not return from his wicked way, by promising him life: (Ezekiel 13:22)
Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof. (2 Tim. 3:5).
"One of his heads as it were wounded to death"
And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death;
and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. (Rev.13:1-3)
According to Masonic sources, the missing head and legs of Orion are symbolized by the ‘Skull & Crossbones’, which strongly indicates that the Freemason's veneration of John the Baptist (who was beheaded) is really the worship of Orion (Nimrod/Tammuz).
"The omission of Orion's head and legs in the constellation of Orion, illustrated above, is immediately noticeable. It would seem that Orion has had his legs and his head chopped off! "A similar practice was observed by the Knights Templar five and a half thousand years later when they were buried. By adopting this practice the deceased Knights Templar became as one with Orion and, by implication, Osiris. The 'skull and crossbones' … Orion's missing head and legs…were also adopted by the Knights Templar as their emblem, their symbol of recognition. "As we shall soon discover, the severed head of Orion is in fact the Sun. Moreover it is the headless Orion which is the source of legends about severed heads." (903, Ch. 9)
The aforementioned publication, Star Names: Their Lore and Meaning, is considered the basic book in its field, which is astrology. Richard Hinckley Allen's dedicatory statement is as follows: "I gratefully dedicate these pages to the memory of Hubert Anson Newton and William Dwight Whitney, senior professors in Yale University who first encouraged me in my work." (927)
Hubert Anson Newton (1830-96) was an American astronomer and mathematician; he was also doctoral advisor to Eliakim Moore, a Skull & Bones member at Yale. William Dwight Whitney was a senior professor on the staff of Yale University when Star Names was published in 1963. William Dwight Whitney is in all probability a direct descendant of a famous American Sanskrit scholar, William Dwight Whitney (1827–94), who became professor of Sanskrit and comparative philology at Yale following his studies in Germany. A ‘William Dwight Whitney’ also shows up on Antony Sutton's list of personages who have held membership in the Order of Skull & Bones. As the date of initiation is not given, we cannot be certain which William Dwight Whitney is on Sutton's list, but it is not unreasonable to speculate that both Yale professors were members of the Skull & Bones. The 19th century Sanskrit scholar/Yale professor would have lived during the period when the Order of Skull & Bones took over the management of Yale University.
"Daniel Coit Gilman ('52), along with two other 'Bonesmen,' formed a troika which still influences American life today. Soon after their initiation in Skull and Bones, Daniel Gilman, Timothy Dwight ('49) and Andrew Dickinson White ('53) went to study philosophy in Europe at the University of Berlin. Gilman returned from Europe and incorporated Skull and Bones as Russell Trust, in 1856, with himself as Treasurer and William H. Russell as President. He spent the next fourteen years in New Haven consolidating the order's power...
"Timothy Dwight, a professor at Yale Divinity School, was installed as president of Yale in 1886. All presidents since, have been either 'Bonesmen' or directly tied to the Order and its interests." 1019
"In 1886 Timothy Dwight (The Order) had taken over from the last of Yale's clerical Presidents, Noah Porter. Never again was Yale to get too far from The Order." 711:93
Rev. President Timothy Dwight (1828-1916) was the grandson of Rev. Timothy Dwight (1752-1817) who was the grandson of the famous Rev. Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758), president of Union College. Both Timothy Dwights were presidents of Yale University. In 1873, the younger Timothy Dwight was elected to serve on the American Revision Committee which had collaborated with Westcott and Hort's English Revision Committee. The elder Timothy Dwight, who was born in 1752, was a also personal friend of President George Washington, a high-level Freemason. One biography states: "Timothy Dwight was a man for all seasons: an ordained Congregational minister, grandson of Jonathan Edwards, personal friend of George Washington, and Army chaplain." 1018
Orion/Saturn/Tammuz/Nimrod/Horus/Osiris = Anunnaki/Nephilim
Orion lies partly in the Milky Way, the alleged 'Galactic Stellar Womb' from which the rest of the galaxy was conceived and born: "Orion, the giant, Hunter, and Warrior, admired in all historic ages as the most strikingly brilliant of the stellar groups, lies partly within the Milky Way, extending on both sides of the celestial equator entirely south of the ecliptic, and so is visible from every part of the globe." (927:303-4) The pre-flood giants, the Annunaki, were said to travel through the Milky Way by way of a planet ship named Nibiru, also called the Mothership. The Anunnaki, which the Bible calls Nephilim, came to Earth to 'pro-create' the human race (Gen. 6) and conveniently relocated to Orion after the Deluge (Gen. 7). The Bible states that no flesh survived the Great Flood, leaving open the possibility that the fallen angels, the Nephilim/Anunnaki, may have escaped:
"Genesis 7:21-23 stress the theme of universal death: "And all flesh died that moved upon the earth... So He destroyed all living things which were on the face of the ground... They were destroyed from the earth. Only Noah and those who were with him in the ark remained alive.'"
According to Laurence Gardner, Noah's son, Ham (who survived the Flood, dishonored his father and was cursed) was Hermes, who taught the Atlantean doctrine to the Egyptians.
"The Tables of Testimony...not to be confused with the Ten Commandments...are rather more associated with the original Table of Destiny of the Anunnaki... This ancient archive is directly associated with the Emerald Table of Thoth/Hermes, and, as detailed in alchemical records of Egypt, the author of the preserved writings was the Biblical Ham, a great Archon of the Grail bloodline. He was the essential founder of the esoteric and arcane 'underground stream' which flowed through the ages and his Greek name, Hermes, was directly related to the science of pyramid construction, deriving from the word herma, which relates to a 'pile of stones'." (348:219)
An alternative spelling for Orion is Arion or Aryan, according to Richard Hinckley Allen: "Catullus transcribed Oarion from Pindar, shortened to Arion and sometimes changed to Aorion..." (927:304) The Aryan race were the demi-gods of Atlantis, the Nephilim/Anunnaki who relocated to the constellation of Orion. The Aryan or 'master race theory', which was popularized in the 19th century by H.P. Blavatsky, provided the philosophical framework for the Nazi Holocaust. "Another source for the master race theory in the early days of the Nazi Party was the occultist Alfred Rosenberg... was convinced that the Aryan race had originated in the lost continent of Atlantis which was the source of all ancient occult beliefs." (25:129-30)
The Aryan race theory claimed a seven step process of human evolution in which successive races evolve from a lower to a higher form of life. Mme Blavatsky called these stages “root races” and identified our current Aryan race as the fifth root race, which followed the fourth race known as the Atlantean. According to the Aryan root race view of history, survivors of the ancient and highly developed lost civilization of Atlantis would one day endow “initiates” with esoteric powers and wisdom. These initiates would use their occult powers to create a new race of Aryan supermen who would eliminate all inferior races. In other words, as the pre-flood Nephilim sired the Merovingian race, demons will again interpose their DNA into the gene pool of humanity by mating with humans. This unhappy prospect was articulated on the website of Dagobert's Revenge:
"Dr. Carl Jung believed that these UFO sightings are a product of our unconscious veiling of an ancient human experience... This 'bringing to earth' of the Sangraal by UFO's is the modern day equivalent of the Nephilim, the Outer Ones, or the Elohim earthing 'knowledge' and siring a new race of 'kingly' beings for this world. Kingly i.e., the Merovingians. The Merovingian blood is the blood of kings, the kings or gods from ancient Sumeria and beyond. ...the Nephilim have been identified as the Fathers of the Merovingians." - 571
But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Matt. 24:37
Orion/Saturn/Tammuz/Nimrod/Horus/Osiris/Anunnaki/Nephilim = Son of Neptune/Poseidon/Beast out of the Sea
According to Star Myths of the Greeks and Romans by Theony Condos, "Hesiod says that Orion was the son of Euryale, the daughter of Minos and of Poseidon and that to him was granted the ability to walk on the sea as he did on the land." (570:147) Recall that, being a giant, Orion could wade through the sea with only his head protruding from the water. Neptune is the Bistea Neptunis — the Beast out of the Sea and Orion was his son. As the son of the Beast out of the sea, it is interesting that Orion has 17 stars, equaling 7 heads and 10 horns:
"The total [of stars in Orion] is seventeen. Hesiod says this is Neptune's son by Euryale... To him was granted the ability to run on the water as he did on the land." (570:148)
And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. Rev. 13:1
Scripture says that sitting upon this 7-headed, 10-headed Beast, which is full of names of blasphemy—Orion/Saturn/Tammuz/Nimrod/Horus/Osiris—is a woman, the Great Harlot; and that the 7-heads are the 7 mountains or hills of Rome, which were named after the sun and moon and five planets:
“Tradition says that Rome was founded in 753 BC by twin boys, Romulus and Remus. Romulus and Remus were abandoned by their parents and were then taken into the care of a she-wolf. From looking at archaeology, researchers discovered that the city of Rome began in 753 BC as a series of farmsteads on a group of hills overlooking the Tiber River. There were seven hills and some believe that Romulus and Remus were not only very proud of finding this land with seven hills, but, for the fact that there were seven planets they worshipped: the Sun, the Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn.” (676)
And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great ***** that sitteth upon many waters:... So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns... And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns... And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth... And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast... And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the ***** , and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire. Rev. 17:1,7,9,12,16
Ignatius Donnelly wrote in Atlantis: The Antediluvian World, that twelve gods originally governed Atlantis: "These deities...were twelve in number: Zeus (or Jupiter), Hera (or Juno), Poseidon (or Neptune), Demeter (or Ceres), Apollo, Artemis (or Diana), Hephæstos (or Vulcan), Pallas Athena (or Minerva), Ares (or Mars), Aphrodite (or Venus), Hermes (or Mercury), and Hestia (or Vesta).' ...Where two names are given to a deity in the above list, the first name is that bestowed by the Greeks, the last that given by the Romans." (635:287)
Later, Atlantis was comprised of ten regions which were ruled by ten kings. In Shambala, Victoria LePage states that Atlantis' "ten districts...were ruled by ten kings." (167:200) This is verified by Donnelly who elaborates on the sacred numeral 'ten' as the number of rulers in ancient empires:
"...The ten kingdoms of Atlantis are perpetuated in all the ancient traditions. 'In the number given by the Bible for the Antediluvian patriarchs we have the first instance of a striking agreement with the traditions of various nations. Other nations, to whatever epoch they carry back their ancestors...are constant to the sacred number of ten... In Chaldea, Perosus numerates ten Antediluvian kings whose fabulous reign extended to thousands of years. The legends of the Iranian race commence with the reign of ten Peisdadien (Poseidon?) kings.... In India we meet with the nine Brahmadikas, who, with Brahma, their founder, make ten, and who are called the Ten Petris, or Fathers. The Chinese count ten emperors, partaking of the divine nature, before the dawn of historical time. The Germans believed in the ten ancestors of Odin, and the Arabs in the ten mythical kings of the Adites.' (Lenormant and Chevallier, 'Anc. Hist. of the East,' vol. i., p. 13.)" (635:26-7)
Orion, although a son of Poseidon/Neptune, did not become a ruler of Atlantis. The first ten kings of Atlantis were the TWIN sons of Poseidon/Neptune, the Bistea Neptunis, or 'beast out of the sea':
Atlas and Eumeleus 8, Ampheres and Evaemon 3, Mnesus and Autochthon, Elasippus 2 and Mestor 4, and Azaes and Diaprepes. "Poseidon and Cleito 2 had five pairs of twins who, along with their descendants, ruled the ten provinces in which Poseidon had divided Atlantis. The island and the ocean were called after Poseidon's first-born Atlas, who was also king over his brothers. The brothers, and the descendants of their ten royal houses ruled over many other islands, and also over the Mediterranean peoples living west of Egypt and Tuscany." (1022)
And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea,
having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns,
and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. Rev. 13:1
Orion as the 'Soul of Osiris'
All young ancient Egyptians were taught that Osiris, the male human aspect of the One Supreme God, lived and reigned as the first king of Egypt. However, Osiris was slain by his evil brother, Seth, who with Osiris, Isis, Nepthys, and the elements, Earth, Air, Fire and Water, formed the One God of the Egyptians, called an Enniad, i.e. nine gods in one. As Nimrod became the constellation Orion after his demise, the Egyptian sun god, Osiris, whose untimely death was mourned by Isis and all of Egypt, is also universally identified as the 'soul of Orion'.
Richard Allen Hinckley, Star Names: Their Lore and Meaning
"Egyptian mythology laid to rest in this constellation the soul of Osiris...and, again, in the Book of the Dead we read: 'Osiris N is the constellation Orion;' In this connection, Orion was known as Smati Osiris, the Barley God...
"In astrology...[the name] Tripater applied to him.
"Saturnus has been another title, but it's connection here I cannot learn, although I hazard the guess that as this divinity was the sun-god of the Phoenicians, his name might naturally be used for Uruanna-Orion, the sun-god of the Akkadians." (927:308)
Colin Wilson, The Atlantis Blueprint: Unlocking the Ancient Mysteries of a Long Lost Civilization
"In Atlantis to the Sphinx (1996) I pointed out that...'[David] Frawley points out that the Hindu Varuna, the Egyptian Osiris and the Greek Ouranos, are all symbolized by [the constellation of] Orion..." (767:165-6)
The esoteric interpretation of the myth of Isis and Osiris is disclosed in Spiritual Politics: Changing the World From the Inside Out: "Like the goddess Isis, who found and restored all of the lost pieces of her husband, Osiris, many are restoring the unity of all life, bringing together the separate parts of humanity — different races, religions and cultures." (42:62) From this understanding, we may infer that Osiris was Nimrod—the great hunter of men and unifier of mankind under a pagan religious system—who, as stated by Hislop, 'was the prototype, the grand original'. Nimrod was simply venerated in various cultures under different names: Osiris, Tammuz, Wotan, Viracocha, Quetzalcoatl, Varuna, etc. All were priest-kings who taught mankind the ancient mysteries as well as academic disciplines. By reason of the supernatural powers and intellectual prowess of these divine beings, the civilization of mankind was greatly advanced. All are expected to return to earth to revive the ancient pre-flood mysteries and culture.
Orion = Viracocha
There is, in addition to Saturn, Tammuz and Nimrod, a correspondence between Osiris and Viracocha, the sun-god of the Incas: "Several authors have speculated upon the mythological connection between the Egyptian god Osiris, and the god Viracocha, of the people of Central Andes. Osiris is believed to have traveled around the globe bringing civilization to many nations... He was tall, of pale complexion, bearded and dressed in a long white robe." (606:286)
Osiris, who ruled over the 'First Time,' was able to walk over (or in) the oceans and 'traveled around the globe bringing civilization to many nations'. Thus, we may conclude that Viracocha = Osiris = Adam = Orion. Viracocha is also analogous to Quetzalcoatl of the Aztecs; to the Queshua, Aymara, and other tribes of South America, he is known as Ameru, which means 'serpent'. It will come as a shock to many Americans that the name 'America' is probably derived from 'Ameru', the serpent-god, and not the Italian voyager 'Amerigo' Vespucci!
As a celibate demi-god, Quetzalcoatl invented the Mayan and Aztec calendar and bequeathed the secret doctrine to his priests, who were also celibate. Quetzalcoatl was driven away on a serpent boat by his evil twin, Tezcatlipoca (the black twin), but is expected to return from the East (where he spread his knowledge of science and the arts) to reclaim his power among the Mesoamerican people. Does Quetzalcoatl not compare to Osiris, who was also murdered by his evil twin, taught the Hermetic doctrines to the Egyptians, and is regarded as Egypt's 'once and future king'? A promo for a book titled The Return of the Serpents of Wisdom, by Mark Amaru Pinkham, reveals that the various supreme deities were all indigenous serpent-gods!
“According to ancient records, the patriarchs and founders of the early civilizations in Egypt, India, China, Peru, Mesopotamia, Britain, and the Americas were the Serpents of Wisdom—spiritual masters associated with the serpent—who arrived in these lands after abandoning their beloved homelands and crossing great seas. While bearing names denoting snake or dragon (such as Naga, Lung, Djedhi, Amaru, Quetzalcoatl, Adder, etc.), these Serpents of Wisdom oversaw the construction of magnificent civilizations within which they and their descendants served as the priest kings and as the enlightened heads of mystery school traditions. The Return of the Serpents of Wisdom recounts the history of these 'Serpents'—where they came from, why they came, the secret wisdom they disseminated, and why they are returning now.” 1023
In The Two Babylons, Hislop elucidates the reason for the lamentation for Osiris/Tammuz/Nimrod et al. The untimely death of this false messiah, known in other cultures as Tammuz, Nimrod, Wotan, Viracocha, Quetzalcoatl and Varuna, meant the dissolution of the global religious system established by this demi-god. Because God put an end to Nimrod's 'unity in diversity' experiment, He is forever labeled as the Scorpion in the Zodiac.
"The name of a scorpion in Chaldee is Akrab; but Ak-rab, thus divided, signifies 'THE GREAT OPPRESSOR,' and this is the hidden meaning of the Scorpion as represented in the Zodiac. That sign typifies him who cut off the Babylonian god, and suppressed the system he set up. It was while the sun was in Scorpio that Osiris in Egypt 'disappeared' (Wilkinson, vol. iv., p.331), and great lamentations were made for his disappearance. Another subject was mixed up with the death of the Egyptian god; but it is specially to be noticed that, as it was in consequence of a conflict with a scorpion that Orion was 'added to the stars,' so it was when the scorpion was in the ascendant that Osiris 'disappeared'." (156:57)
In Fingerprints of the Gods, Graham Hancock draws attention to the fact that the Giza Plateau and Nile River were representations of the constellation of Orion and the Milky Way respectively. It seems that, after the flood and their expulsion from the earth, the Nephilim left the Sphinx, pyramids and Nile River as markers indicating their whereabouts in the heavens. As the three pyramids of Giza correspond to the belt stars of Orion, there are also three pyramids in Mexico which correspond to the Giza pyramids. This design would give credence to speculation that Osiris and Quetzalcoatl were same god, whose soul is claimed to now reside in Orion.
"...archaeo-astronomers making use of the latest star-mapping computer programmes had recently demonstrated that the three world-famous pyramids on Egypt's Giza plateau formed an exact terrestrial diagram of the three belt stars in the constellation of Orion. Nor was this the limit of the celestial map the Ancient Egyptian priests had created in the sands on the west bank of the Nile. Included in their overall vision...there was a natural feature—the river Nile—which was exactly where it should be had it been designed to represent the Milky Way.
"The incorporation of a 'celestial plan' into key sites in Egypt and Mexico...,...the monuments of Teotihuacan, like those of the Giza plateau, played important religious roles in the lives of the communities they served.
"The Central American traditions...gave eloquent expression to a widespread belief that Teotihuacan had fulfilled at least one specific and important religious function in ancient times. According to these legends the City of the Gods was so known because 'the Lords therein buried, after their deaths, did not perish but turned into gods...' In other words, it was 'the place where men became gods'. It was additionally known as 'the place of those who had the road of the gods', and 'the place where gods were made'.
"Just as at Giza, three principal pyramids had been built at Teotihuacan: the Pyramid/Temple of Quetzalcoatl, Pyramid of the Sun and the Pyramid of the Moon....
"Could all this be coincidence? Was it not more logical to conclude that there was an ancient connection between Mexico and Egypt?...
|
|
|
|
"...that the pyramids of Egypt and the ruins of Teotihuacan might express the technology, the geographical knowledge, the observational astronomy (and perhaps also the religion) of a forgotten civilization of the past..." 236:168
As above, so below
In November of 1983, Masonic author Robert Bauval claimed to have discovered that the ground plan of the main three pyramids at Giza were a replica of Orion's Belt in the Constellation of Orion. In a 1994 book, The Orion Mystery, Robert Bauval and Adrian Gilbert claimed that the shafts of the Great Pyramid were pointed directly at key stars in Orion in a way that reflected the configuration of Orion in ancient times. Using astronomical data about stellar movement, Bauval and Gilbert contended that the Orion stars correspond precisely to the pyramids' positions in approximately 10,400 B.C. This period was called by the Egyptians the 'First Time', when the god Osiris ruled the Earth.
"According to a theory by Robert Bauval, the positions of the Giza pyramids on the ground are a reflection of the positions of the stars in the constellation Orion circa 10,500 B.C. (Graham Hancock, Keeper Of Genesis, pp.354-355 ) Five of the 7 brightest stars have pyramid equivalents: The 3 great pyramids of Khufu, Khafra, and Menkaura for the belt of Orion, the pyramid of Nebka at Abu Rawash corresponds to the star Saiph and the pyramid at Zawat al Aryan corresponds to the star Bellatrix. The Nile river corresponds to the Milky Way. The principal Giza monuments formed an accurate terrestrial map of the stars of Orion and Sirius as these constellations appeared in 10,500 BC. (1036)
"The celestial counterpart of Osiris was Orion—a constellation that the ancient Egyptians knew as Sah, the 'Far-Strider' and most frequently depicted by means of the three characteristic belt stars. And since Osiris was said to have ruled in the 'First Time' we wonder whether this could be the reason why the three great Pyramids of Giza depict the three stars of Orion's belt as they looked 12,500 years ago at what might reasonably be defined as their astronomical 'First Time'—i.e. at the beginning of their current upwards precessional cycle?" (132:81)
As previously stated, Orion represented to the ancient Egyptians the 'soul of Osiris', his body having been mummified and interred in the Giza Plateau in a mysterious location called 'the House of Sokar'. The departed soul of Osiris ruled in specific place in the heavens called 'The Duat' which is the constellation of Orion. As king of the Realm of the Dead, Osiris was the means by which men attained ‘eternal life’!
"We find Horus firmly in possession of the earthy 'Kingdom of Osiris' (which had of course been founded in the 'First Time') and we find the body of Osiris himself safely installed in 'the House of Sokar'. Under these ideal conditions, according to the texts, the spiritualized form of Osiris was freed to depart to the sky—and to a specific location in the sky that we have already identified: 'the place where Orion is'. There it was held that he had established the Duat—the cosmic 'Otherworld' on the right bank of the Milky Way—as a sort of 'Kingdom of Osiris' for the Dead.
"Selim Hassan actually calls the Duat 'the Kingdom of Osiris' and shows how 'Osiris is styled 'Lord of the Duat' and the Osiris-King [i.e. the deceased Pharaoh] 'a companion of Orion'..." 132:147
The Great Pyramid was built as a monument to Orion, who, as Osiris was centerpiece of Egyptian worship. Freemasonry, which is also centered on the worship of Osiris and Orion, aspires to revive the pre-flood civilization of Atlantis. The ancient wisdom texts of Hermes Trismegistus, specifically The Book of What is in the Duat, instructed the Egyptian priests that whatever exists in the heavens must be replicated on earth if mankind would restore the ancient pre-flood civilization of Atlantis. On The Message of the Sphinx, Masonic writers Hancock and Bauval have presented detailed information on the Egyptian monuments—a modern 'Book of What is in the Duat' for Neo-Atlanteans.
"...the 'Hermetic Texts' were believed to have been the work of the ancient Egyptian wisdom god Thoth (known to the Greeks as Hermes), who makes the following remarks to his disciple Asclepius: 'Do you not know, Asclepius, that Egypt is an image of heaven? Or, so to speak more exactly, in Egypt all the operations of the powers which rule and work in heaven have been transferred down to earth below?' The purpose to which these powers were harnessed, in the Hermetic view, was to facilitate the initiate's quest for immortality...
"...In one of these texts, Shat Ent Am Duat — the Book of What is in the Duat — we find what appears to be an explicit instruction to the initiate to build a replica on the ground of a special area of the sky known as the 'hidden circle of the Duat': 'Whosoever shall make an exact copy of these forms...and shall know it, shall be a spirit and well equipped both in heaven and earth, unfailingly, and regularly and eternally.'...
"...it is a fact that the Duat sky-region described in the ancient Egyptian texts was dominated by the constellations of Orion and Leo — both of which appear to have been 'imaged' on the ground at Giza (with the former additionally targeted by the southern shaft of the King's Chamber in the Great Pyramid) — and by the star Sirius, which was targeted by the southern shaft of the Queen's Chamber...
"...there are repeated references in the Book of What is in the Duat, and in numerous other funerary and rebirth texts, to Zep Tepi, the 'First Time' — the remote epoch when the gods were believed to have come to earth and established their kingdom in Egypt. These gods included Thoth-Hermes, the 'Thrice-Great' master of wisdom, the goddess Isis whose celestial counterpart was the star Sirius, and Osiris, the 'once and future king', who was killed, revenged by his son Horus, and then reborn to live for ever as the 'Lord of the Duat'." (132:65)
The myth of Osiris, of course, is Satan's attempt to counterfeit the death, resurrection and future reign of Jesus Christ, with the promise eternal life for his disciples, who were called the 'Followers of Horus'. Eternal life for the pharaoh meant that he was reborn as a star in Orion.
"...the constant affirmation, repeated over and over again in these ancient compositions [the Pyramid Texts], was that of life - eternal life -...was to be achieved through the pharaoh's rebirth as a star in the constellation of Orion. ...there were several utterances which voiced this aspiration explicitly:
"'O King, you are this Great Star, the Companion of Orion, who traverses the sky with Orion...you ascend from the east of the sky being renewed in your due season, and rejuvenated in your due time...'" (236:367)
To the followers of Isis, Osiris became the Lord of Eternity after his death and resurrection and thus is able to guarantee them eternal life in Duat, the next world. "Sirius was also of great importance for this star was seen as the stellar domain of Isis, for it was actually giving birth to the infant Horus!... The new Pharaoh had to accompany his predecessor to Orion for the assimilation with Osiris and then be re-born twelve hours later via Isis through Sirius! This was the twelve hours of the Am-Dwat, the twelve hours after death, so the new king dies and is born again in the human form of Horus, the divine son of Osiris." (1032)
To aid their ascent to the Duat, 'the place where Orion is', a hymn was sung at the funeral of deceased pharaohs, who aspired to attain to godhood in the celestial 'Kingdom of Osiris'.
"...Osiris himself, Egypt's 'Once and Future King', died and was then restored to immortal life as Lord of the sky-region of Orion. This region...was known as the Duat. In it all the Pharaos of Egypt hoped that they would reside eternally after their own deaths:
"The gate of the earth is open for you...may a stairway to the Duat be set up for you to the place where Orion is...
O king...the sky conceives you with Orion...the sky has borne you with Orion...
O king, be a soul like a living star...
The gate of the earth-god is open...may you remove yourself to the sky and sit upon your iron throne...
The aperture of the sky window is opened for you...
The doors of iron which are in the starry sky are thrown open for me, and I go through them..." (132:109)
By "gate of the earth-god", "aperture of the sky window" and "doors of iron", the hymn would seem to be referring to a specific place in the Duat as the portal through which Osiris and the pharaohs passed. This portal was called a 'star gate'. As well, state Hancock and Bauval, it was a 'time gate' where the departed souls attained immortality.
"What seems to be envisaged here, taken literally and reduced to the basic common denominators running through all the above utterances, appears to be nothing less than an iron 'stargate' intended to admit Osiris, and all the dynasties of dead kings after him, into the celestial realms of the belt of Orion. But if the Pyramid Texts are describing a stargate then they are also describing a timegate — for they express no doubt that by passing through the iron-doored portals of the sky the soul of the deceased will attain a life of millions of years, navigating eternity in the vessels of the gods." (132:109)
The specific portal through which the pharaohs passed is located in Orion's belt of three stars. Specifically, the King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid was aimed at the belt star, Al Nitak, the brightest belt star. Al Nitack was the Stargate when visible.
"The Great Pyramid has numerous features which leave us without any doubt that its designers paid careful attention to the stars and tracked their transit at the meridian... Most conclusive of all...is the fine accuracy of the four shafts. Recent investigations have established beyond a shadow of a doubt that in circa 2500 BC — the era recognized by Egyptologists as the 'Pyramid Age'— each one of these shafts targeted a special star as it culminated at the meridian.
"From the Queen's Chamber, the northern shaft is angled at 39 degrees and was aimed at the star Kochab (Beta Ursa Minor) in the constellation of the Little Bear — a star associated by the ancients with 'cosmic regeneration' and the immortality of the soul. The southern shaft, on the other hand, which is angled at 39 degrees 30', was aimed at the bright star Sirius (Alpha Canis Major) in the constellation of the Great Dog. This star the ancients associated with the goddess Isis, cosmic mother of the kings of Egypt.
"From the King's Chamber, the northern shaft is angled at 32 degrees 28' and was aimed at the ancient Pole star, Thuban (Alpha Draconis) in the constellation of the Dragon — associated by the Pharaohs with notions of 'cosmic pregnancy and gestation'.
"The southern shaft [of the Great Pyramid], which is angled at 45 degrees 14', was aimed at Al Nitak (Zeta Orionis), the brightest (and also the lowest) of the three stars of Orion's belt — which the ancient Egyptians identified with Osiris, their high god of resurrection and rebirth and the legendary bringer of civilization to the Nile Valley in a remote epoch referred to as Zep Tepi, the 'First Time'." (132:65)
There is considerable controversy over whether the pyramids today reflect the configuration of Orion's belt. There is also controversy over the dating of the pyramids, whether they were built by the pharaohs in the dynastic era circa 3,400 B.C. or much earlier in 10,500 B.C. The early daters solve the configuration discrepancy by claiming that the pyramids were precisely aligned with Orion's belt in 10,500 B.C., but not in 3,400 B.C. Moreover, the Sphinx conjuncted with the constellation Leo in 10,500 B.C., but not in 3,400. This point of view conveniently supports the New Age belief that the pyramids were not built by men, non-existent in 10,500 B.C., but by the Anunnaki (Nephilim), the gods who visited Egypt in the 'First Time'.
"In 2500 BC... the southern shaft of the King's Chamber aligns perfectly with Al Nitak (Zeta Orionis) at an altitude of 45 degrees. But at this point in time the other two stars of Orion's Belt and the Milky Way do not align directly with the other two pyramids and the Nile. "If we 'shift' the sky around..., continually going back in time, we find a perfect match between the pyramids and the three stars of Orion's Belt and the Nile and the Milky way at 10,500 BC ! "As 2500 BC marks the zenith of Al Nitak (i.e.. when it is at its highest point above the horizon), 10,500 BC marks Al Nitak's nadir (i.e., when it is at its lowest point above the horizon). Is this simply coincidence?
"The Sphynx (about half a mile away from the pyramids) points due east and in the pre-dawn of 10,500 BC it would have pointed directly at its celestial counterpart - the constellation of Leo. "Therefore, at the moment of sunrise on the vernal equinox in 10,500 BC there would be a conjunction involving the three Pyramids and the Orion's Belt and a conjunction involving the Sphynx and the constellation of Leo. This conjunction marks the beginning of the 'Age of Leo' and the beginning of the upwards precessional cycle of Orion's Belt. "Can all this be accidental? "It seems unlikely that such engineering and astronomical precision can be purely coincidental. Either the Pharaohs had much more knowledge than we even thought remotely possible or, perhaps, a civilisation more ancient than the Egyptians (circa 10,500 BC, maybe?) once existed and was endowed with great knowledge. "Either way, it seems that the epoch of 10,500 BC is being commemorated by the Pyramids and the Sphynx for some reason." (1024)
Adrian Gilbert maintains that, at the summer solstice in the year 2000, the sun was directly over the outstretched hand of Orion, a phenomenon which last occurred in 10,880 B.C. at which time Atlantis was destroyed. Moreover, when Gilbert held an Ankh cross over the Great Pyramid on June 21, 2000, the sun formed a perfect 'Eye of Horus' over the pyramid.
"...the Pyramid Khafre on 21st June and in time to see it crowned by the sun.
"As the sun climbed higher in the sky, so the shadows departed and standing back a little we could see its reflection on the casing stones. Immediately this brought to mind the Masonic image of the eye in the triangle or pyramidion. This glyph is used in the Great Seal of the United States of America. One wonders if Franklin D. Roosevelt, who had the seal of the United States put on the dollar bill had any idea of the significance of its symbolism. As he was a 33rd degree Freemason, one may suspect that he did. However he probably did not realise that the eye of God (to the ancient Egyptians the Eye of Horus, i.e. the sun) would sit upon the Khafre Pyramid in this way precisely at the summer solstice...
"To see the sun rise and set behind the capstone of a pyramid..." (1017, "Opening the Stargate," Part 4)
To Gilbert, this signaled the opening of a 'stargate' in heaven through which mortals may pass into immortality:
"Today all this has changed. Because of precession the sun is no longer in Leo at the solstice but on the cusp of Gemini and Taurus. In fact it now stands on a position in the zodiac exactly over the outstretched 'hand' of Orion. Curiously enough this position (which I call the 'shake-hands position') is where according to the ancients there exists one of the gates of heaven. There were in fact two of these imaginary gateways at the points where the ecliptic, or pathway of the sun, crosses over the Milky Way. One of these gates was in Gemini over the hand of Orion and the other in Sagittarius over the sting of Scorpio.
"This gateway seems to be what is symbolised by the Sahu (Orion) figure as inscribed on the Benben stone of Amenemhet III at the Cairo Museum. He is depicted as a small walking figure holding a sceptre in one hand and cupping a star in the other. This star or 'S'ba' to give it its Egyptian name has a dual meaning as a hieroglyphic. On the one hand it means 'star' but on the other it means 'gateway'. Thus Orion is correctly shown holding in his hand what we might call a 'stargate'.
"Now the positioning of the sun at the solstice at a stargate is a very extraordinary phenomenon and unique to our present age. It has not happened since around 10,880 BC at around the time when many believe the destruction of Atlantis occurred. The fact that this is now occurring and is somehow linked with the Khafre pyramid seems to me to be an important portent and to symbolise the 'opening of a gate in heaven'. This I don't take in some sci-fi way as symbolising the arrival of aliens or some such but it is, I believe, symbolic of the birth of a new age of mankind. I take it so symbolise the beginning of a new era and a new cycle of possibilities." (1030)
Osiris means 'place of the eye'; his place is in Orion. When the sun directly over Orion at high noon, the Stargate opens, through which Osiris and the pharaohs ascended to the heavens. This is the meaning of the all-seeing eye in the capstone of the pyramid on the dollar bill. According to David Calvert-Orange, author of Isis, Osiris, Divine Kingship and Resurrection, '...the Great Pyramid of Khufu or Cheops...was nothing more than an elaborate Stargate to effect the transmutation of the soul of the dead Pharaoh into the essence of light to enable its assimilation to Osiris in his heavenly abode of Orion." (1032)
Returning to Adrian Gilbert, just as Osiris and the pharaohs ascended through a stargate, Gilbert avers that Jesus Christ ascended in like manner: "Whilst writing Magi he stumbled upon something else, which is that the Ascension of Jesus, which according to the Bible took place 40 days after the Resurrection, would have happened on the precise day that the sun was placed in the northern stargate position: that is to say over the upstretched right-hand of Orion." Curiously, there is no mention in the Bible of stargates, pyramids, cartouches, Orion, ankh crosses or even the position of the sun at the scene of Jesus ascension. (Acts 1) No matter. Mr. Gilbert prefers to expound the Hermetic doctrine of the soul's journey after death instead of the Biblical testimony on this subject: "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment." (Heb. 9:27)
"Having traversed the planetary spheres, before the ascending soul could get back to God, it had to pass through the sphere of the fixed stars, known today as the 'Celestial Sphere'. This represents the 'Higher Heaven' and lies beyond the jurisdiction of our local solar system with its governors the sun, moon and planets. To get to this Higher Heaven, which could in any case only be approached if it had successfully passed through the spheres of the Lower, the soul had to find its way to a gate. According to the ancient cosmology there were two of these: one was in the northern hemisphere and the other was in the southern. These 'stargates' were positioned at the points in the sky where the ecliptic, the pathway of the sun, crosses the Milky Way. Therefore one of these positions was in Sagittarius, above the sting of Scorpio, and the other was in Gemini, above the outstretched arm or 'club' of Orion." (1017, "Opening the Stargate," Part 1)
We have mentioned in a previous section, Capricorn, that in the Age of Aries the Gates of the Sun were Capricorn and Cancer but, due to the precession of the equinoxes, those gates, whereby souls descend and ascend to heaven (they say), are now, in the Age of Pisces, Gemini and Sagittarius. In other words, the constellations of Gemini and Sagittarius are on the point where the ecliptic (path of the sun) intersects with the Milky Way (the Galactic Stellar Womb). In Hermetic doctrine, the Orion factor determines when the stargate opens. According to Adrian Gilbert and Graham Hancock, the Stargate opened in the year 2,000 with the sun at the stargates at the solstices, the northern stargate being Orion. This event has not happened since the 'First Time' some 12,880 years ago.
"The northern stargate over the upstretched 'hand' of Orion is exactly at the cusp of Gemini and Taurus; the southern stargate is at the cusp of Sagittarius and Scorpio...
"Today the sun stands exactly between Sagittarius and Scorpio at the winter solstice and over the hand of Orion at the time of the summer solstice. In other words the positions of the stargates correspond with the sun's positions at the solstices. This is the first time this has happened since c.10,880 BC when the gates were in the opposite positions, with the Orion gate in the south and the Scorpio gate in the north. This latter date, c.10,880 BC, corresponds closely with the ending of the last ice age and the legendary destruction of Atlantis [According to Plato, the Greek philosopher, the last phase of this destruction took place around 9500 BC]. Thus we can say with some assurity that last time the Sun was positioned at the stargates at the solstices corresponded with major changes in the earth's climate. (1017, Adrian Gilbert, "Opening the Stargate," Part 2)
"...Curiously the epoch of the year 2000, which figures in these Christian prophecies [of Edgar Cayce], also coincides with the Last Time (or highest point) in the great upwards cycle of the belt stars of the Orion constellation, just as the epoch of the eleventh millennium BC coincided with the First Time (or lowest point) of that cycle." (Graham Hancock) (236:500)
STARGATE
In the 1994 movie, Stargate, a magical portal is opened to "the other side of the known universe" through the alignment of symbols on an ancient Egyptian device. The central character, an Egyptologist played by actor, James Spader, is hired to unlock the mysterious hieroglyphs on an Egyptian artifact consisting of a number of symbols enclosed within a circular frame. Spader discovers that the images on the outer frame are not hieroglyphs (Egyptian writing characters) but star constellations. The final symbols to be deciphered turn out to be the constellation of Orion and a pyramid with the sun directly overhead and two priests praying before it. The sun over the pyramid means that the Stargate opens when the sun is over Orion at high noon. This Stargate apparatus to transport human beings through time to another world is described in the following synopsis of the movie.
"Daniel Jackson is taken to a converted missile silo in Creek Mountain, Colorado. There, Catherine, another Egyptologist and a physics professor show Jackson a large circular artefact with two main sets of writing; one on an outer track around the artefact's circumference, and another on an inner track which has symbols which also appear on a cartouche in the centre. Jackson says only the inner track contains hieroglyphs, which when translated describe how Ra, the Egyptian God of the sun, was banished for all time when an object called a Stargate was buried... "Jackson researches ancient languages to try and find the meaning of the outer track, but his extensive search is in vain. However, looking at the astrology section of a newspaper he realises that one of the symbols on the outer track matches the constellation Orion. The symbols on the outer track, he realises, are not a written language but star constellations. Jackson presents his discovery to General West and the team of Air Force officers, explaining the seven symbols on the cartouche denote a course. Six symbols show a destination; to specify a particular point within a three-dimensional object, one requires six different points on the surface of that object. Two points on both sides of the object's length draw a straight line, which intersects with similar lines along the width and depth provide one particular point. The seventh symbol, Jackson says, is a point of origin.
"The cartouche contains six specific constellations, but one which is separate from the others is a picture of two priests praying before a Pyramid with the sun over them, which Jackson says is most likely the point of origin. One scientist rejects Jackson's claims, saying the point of origin isn't on 'the device'. Asking what the device is, the military personnel show Jackson the large ring which was found in the film openings. Catherine explains 'It's your Stargate.' "The group go into the control center of the Stargate, where Catherine explains the object which her father found is made of a material not found anywhere else on Earth. The Stargate contains all the symbols which were present on the outer circle of the artefact, and Jackson identifies the point of origin; previously undetected as it does not contain as much detail as the symbol on the cartouche. "Entering the now complete sequence of seven symbols, the Stargate opens in a blaze of energy, creating a portal. A probe is sent through, which records the other side of the portal is on the other side of the known universe and is capable of sustaining human life. The Stargate closes a short time after the probe is sent through." (1033)
To make a long story short, a reconnaissance team was transported back in time to "the other side of the known universe" where it remained stranded until James Spader deciphered the code which transported them back to earth. Predictably, this mediocre production was a prelude to even more noxious science fiction concerning ancient gods who descended to earth from the star system Sirius in the constellation of Orion. A retired CBS director, Mark Roberts, revealed the real Stargate agenda in Stargate: The Real One:
"The word Stargate has become a merging point between fiction & reality. The cinema Stargate was an ancient time-dimensional doorway to the cosmos ~ with knowledge of ancient writings & star constellations as the keys to opening the gate... The reality Stargate is an ancient depiction of a cosmic-portal painted at the entry to a cave containing one of the most ancient representations of the constellation known as the Pleiades. The star map and other ancient paintings & features within the cave have provided the keys to connect over four decades of study involving: decades of field archaeology linked to an ancient alphabet; Egyptian hieroglyphs; ancient symbols for the star system known as Sirius, revered as the Star Goddess Sothis by the ancient Egyptians; and links to an even more ancient culture ~ with a directional key to a prime base of the cosmic visitors who had arrived on earth at the very dawn of antiquity." (1035)
A primetime TV series based on the film features the discovery of a giant cartouche covered in hieroglyphics which is a map of other Stargates throughout the galaxy. This important find makes it possible for the U.S. Air Force to "battle evil throughout the universe for the good of planet Earth." In the final episode of the Stargate series, which will air in March 2004, the Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force will make an appearance:
"8/26/2003 - VANCOUVER, British Columbia — Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John Jumper stars as himself here Aug. 26 on an upcoming episode of the Sci-Fi Channel's primetime television series 'Stargate: SG-1.' Jumper performed a handful of lines during the day of filming. The scenes will appear in the internationally syndicated show's season finale in March. The series depicts a fictional Cheyenne Mountain-based, top-secret Air Force command, which battles evil throughout the universe for the good of planet Earth." (997)
The implications of government sanction of the 'Stargate conspiracy' are staggering considering verses in the Bible which foretell that the 'kings of the earth' will wage war against Jesus Christ at His Second Coming. For detailed information on this defining moment of the Tribulation period, when the occult societies will misrepresent Jesus Christ as Satan, being cast out of heaven (Rev. 12) or the bottomless pit (Rev. 20), please refer to our report Heeding Bible Prophecy: Armageddon: War Against Jesus Christ: Star Wars Program
Cheers,
------------------ ~*Silverstone~*
|
|
|
|
Astronomy Bible
Wednesday, October 14th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
Look at Amos 5:8 – in the KJV – The 7 stars in Orion is Osiris. Why is this in the bible?
The 7 stars in Orion’s belt represents Osiris in Kemet and others religions as well. I thought Christians were not supposed to indulge in astronomy. Then why is it in the Bible?
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=amos%205:8&version=9
Seek him that maketh the seven stars and Orion, and turneth the shadow of death into the morning, and maketh the day dark with night: that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth: The LORD is his name: Here is a pic-
http://www.crystalinks.com/orion1.gif
you can do all the reasearch you want to! You will find a wealth of info on Osiris and the 7 stars! ASTROLOGY – YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN – PLEASE DONT GET COUGHT UP IN THAT! The Hebrew bible translates into the 7 stars in Orion.
|
|
|
|
15 JUNIO 2011:
ECLIPSE TOTAL DE LUNA ENTRE EL CENTRO GALÁCTICO Y LA CONSTELACIÓN DE ORIÓN
|
|
|
|
LA SOMBRA DE LA LUNA EN LA PIEL DE LA MADRE TIERRA
|
|
"Dionisio el Areopagita" (Antoine Caron)
|
LUNAR (sombra de la Luna) en la Piel de la Madre (Tierra)
|
El pasado 4 de enero de 2011, coincidiendo con el momento en que la Nave Tierra estaba en el punto de su órbita más cercano al Sol (perihelio) la Luna pasó entre la Tierra y el Sol. Esto no tiene nada de particular en cuanto que ocurre cada 29 días y medio. Lo particular es que el satélite cruzó por la línea entre el Sol y el umbral del amanecer de la Tierra en el momento en que la región de la Península Ibérica pasa del lado nocturno al diurno, de modo que los navegantes humanos de la Nave Tierra que viven ahí pudieron tomar la sombra de la Luna durante un rato. Se vio desde Cataluña (como desde Barcelona) aunque no desde Galicia porque la región gallega estuvo cubierta por las nubes. La sombra de la Luna no eclipsó a España, pues España está en otra dimensión en la que los españoles mantienen su propia sombra que llaman "crisis". Tres centros, el del Sol, el de la Luna y el de las pupilas (más negras que la Luna o la propia sombra de la Luna), estarán en conjunción y alineación. Fue un eclipse parcial.
Dado que la sombra de la Luna se proyectó en el umbral del amanecer de la Madre Tierra (su hermana Tierra), pudo verse al amanecer y por tanto hacia el oriente (este).
|
|
|
Amanecer del 4 de enero de 2011 en Galicia, al NorOeste de la Península Ibérica.
|
Mientras el planeta gira y la región en la que vivimos cruza el umbral de noche y día, las personas "amanecemos" y recuperamos la línea de visión del Sol. Amanecemos nosotros aunque decimos que "amanece el Sol" o "amanece el día". Así, mientras la "Cabeza de Iberia" amanece el día 4 de enero se vio también a la Luna ya eclipsando parcialmente al Sol, de modo que Iberia amaneció con una especie de Visera cósmica. Desde Galicia (cubierta por las nubes ese día) se hubiese visto una "salida" de Sol y de Luna al mismo tiempo. La Luna y el Sol saliendo juntos, como novios. Por eso, aunque todos los eclipses y amaneceres son de categoría especial, este amanecer eclipsado o eclipse tempranero fue "fuera de categoría".
Dado que el eclipse puede durar unos 6 minutos (6x60 segundos), en este caso de eclipse de Sol en el amanecer es como si el día tardara en llegar 6 minutos más de lo que le corresponde. Durante ese tiempo la Luna hace de sombrilla o parasol cósmico. En ese tiempo la Nave planetaria gira 1,5 grados y se traslada 108.000 kms, y la Luna recorre unos 360 kms en sentido contrario al del planeta Tierra.
Un Lunar en la Piel de la Madre. Una visera en Galicia, la Frente de Iberia.
|
|
Amanecer del 4 de enero de 2011 en Galicia, al NorOeste de la Península Ibérica.
|
|
En 2011 se produce un eclipse de Sol el día 1 de junio. Es parcial, y 14 días después, el día 15, ocurre un eclipse total de Luna.
El eclipse de Sol (y la sombra de la Luna) es debido a la alineación de la Luna entre el Sol y una determinada franja del planeta, pues es el satélite el que se incorpora a la línea Sol/Tierra al desplazarse 30 veces más rápido que la Nave Tierra. Durante un eclipse de Sol, la velocidad a la que nos alcanza o nos rebasa la sombra de la Luna es el resultado de la suma de la velocidad de traslación de la Luna (a 1 km por segundo) y de nuestro desplazamiento (tan inevitable como involuntario) hacia el oriente debido al giro de la Tierra y ambos movimientos son en el mismo sentido. El diámetro de la sombra de la Luna en la superficie del planeta viene a tener un máximo de unos 270 kms. Esto significa que la sombra de la Luna, cual alfrombra en el suelo de la Casa Tierra, es unas 13 veces más pequeña que la propia Luna. También podríamos extender 148 veces la sombra de la Luna por la circunferencia ecuatorial del planeta.
Nosotros tenemos lunares en la piel, la superficie del cuerpo, pero no son provocados por una sombra proyectada por la "luna", palabra de la cual deriva "lunar". Sólo en la superficie de la Tierra puede haber un "lunar" creado por la Luna, cuando ésta pasa por la línea imaginaria que une al Sol y la Tierra y proyecta su sombra en el planeta. Así que, considerando al planeta como Madre (la de todas sus especies) podemos decir que, a veces, a la Madre le aparece un lunar en su Piel: la sombra de la Luna.
|
|
|
LUNAR en la Piel de la Madre Tierra. La sombra de la Luna en la Tierra. Eclipse de Sol.
|
Un eclipse de Sol por sí solo ya es un fenómeno espectacular independientemente de que sea considerado algo más que un evento astronómico. Sin duda que es una gran coincidencia que un puntito tan pequeño como es el planeta Tierra reciba la sombra de un puntito 3,6 veces aún más pequeño (la Luna) mientras flotan circulando por una región espacial tan inmensa y "vacía" como es el Sistema solar. Tan inmensa es que si abarcáramos en nuestro campo de visión sólo media órbita de la Tierra, no podríamos ver a la Tierra ni apenas distinguir el área orbital de la Luna. Aquí vemos al Sol (que es 109 veces más grande que el planeta Tierra) en el centro de las órbitas, y a "otro Sol" en el perímetro de la órbita de la Tierra. La imagen es a escala.
|
Pero la coincidencia es aún mayor cuando a tal alineación Tierra/Luna/Sol se suma otro punto más, pero no cualquiera, sino el punto básico: el propio Centro de la galaxia, lo cual ya depende de que la Tierra llegue al punto de su órbita en el momento en que para nosotros es 19 de diciembre y la Luna coincida en fase nueva. El día 24 de noviembre del año 29 ocurrió un eclipse así en Jerusalén al mediodía con la Tierra ante la Luna y el Sol y el Centro galáctico.
|
|
|
Vista cenital de la órbita de la Tierra el 24 de noviembre del año 0029. Eclipse de Sol en Jerusalén.
|
Y además, dado que el Sol está situado entre el Centro Galáctico y la región en la que desde la Tierra vemos a la constelación de Orión, ésta estaba justo detrás de la Tierra.
Esta escena es una recreación viendo al Sol, la luz, la Luna y su sombra en la superficie de la Tierra.
Y ésta más cerca y con más en detalle.
Con el cielo de la región de Jerusalén despejado, se habría visto a la Luna ocultando al Sol en plena franja de la Vía Láctea. Eso sí, difícilmente se distinguiría el Centro de la galaxia. Si pasas el cursor del ratón por la siguiente doble imagen se puede distinguir la posición del Centro Galáctico y la franja de la Vía Láctea formando un ángulo recto con el horizonte. Parece el Árbol galáctico visto desde 32º norte de una de las Frutas (planeta Tierra) de una de sus Ramas (sistema Solar).
|
Vista del cielo desde Jerusalén a las 13:30 horas del día 24 de noviembre del año 29. La Luna eclipsando al Sol.
|
Esta imagen está tomada del programa de astronomía Stellarium. En la página stellarium.org puedes descargar gratuitamente un planetario de software libre. Otros dos programas de astronomía se ha usado para encontrar en la misma fecha un eclipse en Jerusalén al mediodía. Los programas son "DISTANT SUNS", de Virtual Reality Labs (1996) y la Enciclopedia del Espacio y el Universo de Zeta Multimedia.
|
Si el programa permitiera añadir nubes a la escena, la oscuridad sería mucho mayor y por supuesto no se vería el eclipse.
Varios pintores han dibujado eclipses en sus cuadros, como Antoine Caron, y también en escenas sobre la Crucifixión, como José de Ribera, Pannemarker o Pesellino.
Un eclipse de Sol lo menciona Lucas en su evangelio (capítulo 23, versículos 44-45). En las dobles imágenes siguientes, los pintores imaginaron la escena con el Sol eclipsado por la Luna. También el pintor Pesellino (siglo 15) realizó un cuadro con un eclipse de Sol y de Luna (una luna ensangrentada). 14 días después del eclipse de Sol del 24/11/29 hubo un eclipse parcial de Luna.
|
|
De Wikipedia: Mark Kidger del Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias (Tenerife, España), comparó el evangelio apócrifo de Pedro con las eclipses históricas. Indicó que el eclipse total del 24 de noviembre de 29 D.C. fue presenciada geográficamente muy cerca del lugar de la crucifixión, pasando la sombra cerca del norte de Jerusalén a las 11:05 A.M. siendo el momento máximo de oscuridad del 95% en dicho lugar y debió pasar desapercibido para la mayoría de quienes estaban fuera de sus casas. El eclipse fue total en Nazaret y Galilea durante 1 minuto y 49 segundos.
|
Lucas señala que hubo tinieblas desde la hora sexta a la hora novena (o nona, y la hora séptima y media como hora central), lo cual es según el uso horario romano (modernamente desde las 12 del mediodía a las 15 con las 13:30 como central). 3 horas es la duración media de un eclipse desde que la sombra de la Luna entra en la región en la que estamos hasta que sale, y en el caso de que haya nubes, la sombra de éstas hace aún más densa la oscuridad, y por supuesto, si la Luna estuviera pasando entre la Tierra y el Sol no podríamos ver que se está produciendo un eclipse.
Aquel eclipse de Sol (no necesariamente la crucifixión) ocurrió con la Luna y el Sol sobre el Centro galáctico en mitad de la franja de la Vía Láctea entre las constelaciones de Ofiuco y Sagitario, que simbolizan al Serpentario y al Centauro arquero que en la mitología griega se llaman Asclepio y Quirón, personajes míticos íntimamente relacionados por ser discípulo y maestro en el arte de la sanación cuyo arquetipo representativo por excelencia es la serpiente, porque su veneno contiene su propio antídoto, y de hecho es utilizada como símbolo por la ciencia médica y la Organización Mundial de la Salud (aunque con el dinero como intermediario). También la constelación de Ofiuco está en mitad de la constelación de la Serpiente.
También, el 24 de noviembre del 29 a las 13:30 horas, en la cenital de Palestina (trazando una línea desde el Centro de la Tierra pasando por Jerusalén y proyectándola al Firmamento) estaba la constelación del Cisne, llamada la Cruz del Norte (ver también constelación de la Cruz del Sur), es decir, la Cruz del Norte sobre la cruz en la que estuviera Jesús, y sobre Jerusalén y Palestina. Tanto la Cruz del Norte como el Centro galáctico están en plena franja de la Vía Láctea.
|
La Cruz del Norte en el punto cenital de la región de Palestina a las 13:30 horas del 24 de noviembre del año 29 al mismo tiempo que se producía un eclipse con la Luna ocultando al Sol sobre el Centro de la galaxia en la franja de la Vía Láctea.
|
Si Jesús hubiera nacido en el año -7 (746 de Roma) y hubiera muerto en el año 29 (el 782 de Roma) habría vivido 36 años, aunque la idea generalmente supuesta y aceptada es que tenía 33 años al morir, lo cual significaría que habría muerto en el año 26, y en este año también hubo un eclipse en Jerusalén al mediodía del 6 de febrero con el Sol al final de la región de Acuario. A más posibilidades más interpretaciones.
Por su lado, también el tan célebre como críptico Nostradamus menciona un eclipse de sol y lo relaciona de alguna forma (a interpretación) con la pasión y muerte de Jesucristo en una de las cartas con las que mantenía correspondencia con el Rey Enrique II: "Esto será precedido por un eclipse de sol, más oscuro y tenebroso que nunca desde la creación del mundo salvo después de la muerte y pasión de Jesucristo" (Fuente: http://www.caesaremnostradamus.com/Escritos_archivos/Traducciones/Henry%20II.htm).
|
|
|
Extracto de la carta de Nostradamus a su Rey Enrique II hablando de un eclipse solar relacionado con la muerte de Jerucristo.
|
También en la Cuarteta 72 de la Centuria X, posiblemente se refiere de forma alegórica (como "un gran rey del terror") a la sombra de un eclipse de Sol en su futuro año 1999, mes 7: "En el año mil novecientos noventa y nueve siete meses, vendrá del cielo un gran rey del terror...". En el mes 8, 11 de agosto de 1999 ocurrió un eclipse total de Sol durante el que la sombra de la Luna cruzó Europa pasando por Francia. Una curiosidad es que fue el último eclipse total de Sol del mismo milenio (1000-2000) en cuya mitad (1503) nació Michel de Nostredame.
Evidentemente no sabemos con seguridad en qué fecha se produjo el eclipse "más oscuro y tenebroso" de entre los que podemos tener noticia, pero tal "tenebrosidad" sólo puede ocurrir cuando a la sombra de la Luna se suma la sombra de densas nubes de tormenta. Si Lucas cita el eclipse sería porque él sí conocía que había ocurrido o porque alguien se lo habría comunicado. De haber ocurrido y de haber sido visto hubiese sido lógico que hubiera quedado grabado en la memoria popular humana pues se habría presenciado a la Luna eclipsando al Sol en plena franja de la Vía Láctea y sobre el punto del Centro galáctico (aunque no se supiera donde estaba el Centro de la Galaxia). 14 días después ocurrió un eclipse (parcial) de Luna.
El pintor Francesco Pesellino realizó en el siglo 15 un cuadro sobre la Crucifixión mostrando un eclipse de Sol, pero también de Luna en la misma escena. Igualmente Pieter Pannemaker en el siglo 16.
Si imaginamos el eclipse desde el espacio "exterior" podemos entender que la SOMBRA DE LA LUNA es literalmente un LUNAR, y así como la piel de nuestro cuerpo tiene lunares será porque la Piel de la Madre (Tierra) los puede tener.
|
|
|
LUNAR en la Piel de la Madre Tierra. La sombra de la Luna en la Tierra. Eclipse de Sol.
|
Actualmente, el "tránsito" del Sol por el meridiano celeste en el que está el Centro galáctico en plena franja de la Vía Láctea ocurre cada día gregoriano 19 de diciembre. O dicho de otra forma y de la forma que refleja la realidad: se trata del tránsito de la Nave Tierra por el meridiano celeste contrario al meridiano en el que vemos situado al centro galáctico. No es que la cronología se haya corrido o retrasado 25 días (del 24 de noviembre al 19 de diciembre en 2000 años) sino que durante 2000 órbitas de la Tierra el sistema planetario se ha desplazado una sección de círculo por el Espacio en torno a un centro más exterior y masivo (como la Tierra una 12ª parte cada mes en torno al Sol) y así el punto de la órbita respecto al Sol y el Centro galáctico, una dinámica que no podemos reproducir en calendarios (estructuras rígidas para un tiempo), y de hecho no es importante en nuestro estado de conciencia ni para nuestros propósitos personales durante una esperanza de vida de 70 años, ni para los de una sociedad que dura más pero no está integrada en el orden y dinámica del Universo. El hecho de que la Luna se una a la cita -aunque no siempre eclipsando al Sol- ocurre cada 19 años. Por eso este tipo de eclipse con la Luna ocultando al Sol sobre el Centro de la galaxia (y concretamente en Jerusalén) no es muy frecuente. De hecho volvió a ocurrir 475 años más tarde (año 504) y luego 437 años después (año 941). El siguiente sí se produjo otra vez 475 años después (año 1416). Y el siguiente en 1919 (503 años después). Estos cuatro dan una media de unos 472 años (25 ciclos de 19 años).
Es decir que si la Luna volviera a pasar justo por la línea Tierra/Sol durante un 19 de diciembre, se produciría un eclipse de Sol justo ante el Centro de la galaxia y apreciaríamos en todo su esplendor la Vía Láctea en pleno día, como el Árbol galáctico visto con ojos humanos desde 32º al norte del ecuador de una de las Frutas (planeta Tierra) de una de sus Ramas (sistema Solar).
También puede darse el caso de que la Luna esté ahí mientras pasa por el cono de sombra de la Tierra, tal como ocurre el día 15 de junio de 2011. El día 1 se produce un eclipse (parcial) de Sol Es parcial, y 14 días después, el día 15, se produce ese eclipse total de Luna con ésta y la sombra de la Tierra en la franja de la Vía Láctea y sobre el Centro galáctico.
En 2012, el 20 de mayo el Sol estará bajo las Pléyades y la Luna pasará entre la Tierra y el Sol, de modo que ocurre un eclipse ANULAR de Sol ante las Pléyades. La parte más densa de la sombra de la Luna pasará por el monte Fuji, la ciudad de Tokyo (y rozando a la ya famosa ciudad de Fukushima) y tras cruzar el Pacífico por el sur de las Islas Aleutianas, por San Francisco, prácticamente las dos únicas grandes ciudades habitadas por millones de personas desde las que se verá el eclipse con mayor nitidez.
|
|
|
|
|
2160 comenzaria era de acuario con ORION JUSTO EN EL SOLSTICIO
|
|
|
|
The identification of these three stars as a belt is a very old one. The Arabic names of two of the stars reflect this: Mintaka means 'the belt' and Alnitak means 'the girdle'. (The name of the third star, Alnilam, means 'the string of pearls'.) It has been suggested that the three Belt-stars influenced the placing of the Pyramids at Giza, and it is certainly true that there is a remarkable correspondence of position between the Pyramids and the stars. (courtesy of glyphweb.com)
Across the centuries, the three stars we know familiarly as Orion's Belt have held a special meaning to many people in many cultures, especially when the number three held spiritual significance as kings, wise men, or gods.
Here are a few of those stories:
The Three Kings of the pyramids
http://ad2004.com/Biblecodes/Hebrewmatrix/pyramidspt1.html
Pyramid
|
Egyptian Name
|
Greek Name
|
Star in Orion
|
great pyramid
|
Khufu
|
Cheops
|
Alnitak
|
center pyramid
|
Khafre
|
Chephren
|
Alnilam
|
smallest pyramid
|
Menkaura
|
Mycerinus
|
Mintaka
|
The Three Magi of Christian Tradition from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_Magi
The word Magi is a Latinization of the plural of the Greek word magos (μαγος pl. μαγοι), which is a derivative from Old Persian Magupati. The term is a specific occupational title referring to the priestly caste of a branch of Zoroastrianism known as Zurvanism. As part of their religion, these priests paid particular attention to the stars, and gained an international reputation for astrology.
The phrase from the east is the only information Matthew provides on where the Magi came from, apart from identifying that they come from their own country rather than Judea. Traditionally the view developed that the Magi were Persian or Parthian, a view held for example by John Chrysostom, and Byzantine art generally depicted them in Persian dress. The main support for this is that the first Magi were from Persia and that land still had the largest number of them. Some believe they were from Babylon, which was the centre of Zurvanism, and hence astrology, at the time. Brown comments that the author of Matthew probably didn't have a specific location in mind and the phrase from the east is for literary effect and added exoticism. Though the Bible does not number the Magi [nor, apparently, name them], traditionally there were always seen to be three, as three of the gifts were specifically named.
In the Eastern church a variety of different names are given for the three, but in the West the names have been settled since the 8th century as Caspar, Melchior and Balthasar. The names of the Magi derive from an early 6th century Greek manuscript in Alexandria, translated into the Latin Excerpta Latina Barbari. The Latin text Collectanea et Flores continues the tradition of three kings and their names and gives additional details of their clothes, coming from Syria. This text is said to be from the 8th century, of Irish origin. In the Eastern churches, Ethiopian Christianity, for instance, has Hor, Karsudan, and Basanater, while the Armenians have Kagbha, Badadakharida and Badadilma.
In China, the three stars of Orion's Belt represented the Three Pristine Ones in Daoism: Celestial Worthy of Numinous Treasure, Celestial Worthy of Original Beginnings, Celestial Worthy of the Dao and Inner Power
Also from China, the three belt stars represented the Chinese Star Lords of Good Fortune whose worship began in the 15th c., Fu (Prosperity/Wealth), Lu (Success) and Shu (Longevity). However, Shu was worshipped much earlier, as early as the 3rd c. BCE
In Shinto beliefs: http://www2.gol.com/users/stever/orion.htm According to Uchida (1973), many Japanese came to call the three belt stars of Orion Taishikou San Daishi. Taishikou refers to Winter, and San Daishi refers to three great preachers or teachers. Around the 11th month of each lunar calendar year, on the 23rd and 24th days, various celebrations were and still are made honoring three particularly significant Buddhist teachers who founded sects of that religion in the Nara and Heian eras of Japan: Tendai Daishi (founder of the Tendai Buddhist Sect), Saichou (follower and teacher of the Tendai sect), and Kobo Daishi (founder of the Shingon sect and also famous for establishing the 88 temples of Shikoku around the 9th century).
One can hardly speak of the stars of the Belt of Orion without mentioning the significance of Sirius, the Dog Star. For more information on Sothis/Sopdet/Sirius the Dog Star see How Long Does a Phoenix Live .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ever since its discovery atop a hill in Germany in 1999, a bronze and gold artefact dubbed the ‘Nebra disc’, has baffled both archaeologists and historians alike as to its authenticity. Despite numerous court hearings to prove that this supposed Bronze Age relic is not a hoax, researchers are still adamant about defining what they believe it means. The general consensus is that it is representative of important stars, although opinions differ vastly as to which stars are purportedly shown… except for a cluster of ‘dots’ that all seem to be in agreement with.
The cluster seems to represent the Pleiades.
One of the more recent opinions expressed by an archaeologist in an entry on ‘Online Spiegel’( 21 February 2006) is that in BC1600, the year the disc supposedly dates back to, the people living in the Sachsen-Anhalt area where it was found, used the disc to orientate themselves as to the seasons… an astronomical clock as it were.
Be that as it may, Wayne Herschel, author of ‘The Hidden Records’ has reason to believe there is a lot more at play here. For him the disc is yet another piece of the cosmic puzzle he proposes in his star map theory that seems to fit with almost all ancient civilisations.
On first examining it, Wayne could not help thinking: Would the Orion, Pleiades and Sun-like-star cosmic pattern that seems to be included in most ancient cultures appear on this disc also? Would Orion come into play, as the cosmic signpost theme as it appears in so many of the other star maps in his book?
Of course if this is the case, it will also put Germany onto the map as once hosting an advanced culture just like the ancient Egyptians and other ancient civilisations.
From his interpretation, Wayne agrees with other researchers who say the disc maps out the Pleiades among its 32 stars, but he takes this finding to new as yet unexplored heights.
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, he has only recently realised that there appears to be an interpretation of the Milky Way in relation to the position of the Pleiades.
Once he had made this simple deduction, the missing Orion constellation fell into place. It was perfectly presented. There are three dots in the very centre and it fits precisely between the two gold curved edges that adorn the two opposite ends of the disc. Is this the answer? In the image below, notice how the four outer Orion stars seem interpreted symmetrically and are located near the ends of each of these curved gold edges.
Wayne ’s proposed interpretation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Note how Wayne has proposed a completely new solution for the Milky Way on the right hand side gold insert on the Nebra disc. It is surrounded with hundreds of small grooves (stars) while having lines like a curved rainbow. This is the clue here, because the Milky Way is depicted curved from one horizon to the other, just like a rainbow.
Orion appears to fit centrally as the cosmic signpost that one must follow to find the Pleiades. This is true in the night sky. Wayne realises that the way in which Aldebaran is shown may be reason for debate. He believes they would not have left out Aldeberan or Sirius. However, he ascribes this to its ‘designers’ possibly having allowed themselves a certain amount of ‘artistic licence’:
“It is as if they first put in the orb and crescent… associated with Orion, Aldebaran and Sirius showing the way to these sacred gold icons… then the Pleiades and the outer star references were filled in.
Why?
Because, as was the case in other ancient civilisations, they most likely would have wanted to give prominence to the heavenly bodies that were of greatest significance!
Coincidently, the gold dots that make up the Pleiades also have three small stars in a row, which Wayne has referenced previously in his other proposed star map solutions. The three small stars generalise the direction to the Sun-like star… and it seems approximately correct here. The angle ‘x’ formed is very similar to the angle the Pleiades form with the Orion’s Belt star alignment, in comparison with the significant Sun-like star he isolates on the star atlas shown below. It is the same angle that seems to repeatedly recur at numerous ancient sites.
He believes that in all likelihood the crescent on the Nebra disc is not representative of the moon, just as the orb in all likelihood is NOT our Sun. Primarily because the Sun and the stars do not appear concurrently when we look at the sky, but also because it is more reasonable to understand more emotion might be attached to the place of their ‘gods’ rather than our very mundane daily Sun.
Wayne has a slightly different interpretation of the Pleiades than that suggested by academics. Scholars have commented that this cluster does not appear to have exacting form.
|
|
|
|
|
Examine the star atlas image above. Notice that the brightest star constellations have a general similarity to the stars on the Nebra disc.
If one studies the Sumerians, there are hundreds of instances in which a large star and a crescent with seven heavenly bodies are depicted in conjunction with one another. Scholars have already suggested that the seven heavenly bodies are the Pleiades. If the ancients claim there ‘gods’ came from the stars, is it not fair to suggest this Orb and crescent have something to do with their place of origin?
It would therefore make sense that what is being depicted, is not our Sun at all, but a ‘Sun-like’ star system. In the same token, the crescent might in all likelihood be a planet associated with this star. A place of origin perhaps for a very advanced flesh and blood ‘god’!
Researchers claim that the Nebra disc is the "oldest representation of the stars in the world."
Wayne believes this claim could be a little premature. One need only take a look at the Lascaux cave which he explores in his book. This cave in France has the very same star map theme, and the site is over 17000 years old. Watch the website soon for a preview. The cave also has a second ‘mythological’ version of the star map, and quite amazingly it appears to portray Orion as a deity, the very same bird headed deities of the Egyptians and Sumerians.
Given that archaeologists have come to believe that the Mittelberg hill and its concrete pit where the disc was found, served as a type of observatory, they will no doubt find Wayne’s new theory hard to swallow. The archaeological dig has gone down about half a metre into the soil, leaving loose stone walls standing. The site was once surrounded by wooden palisades and a complex of defensive ditches. Small wonder that many have likened it to Stonehenge!
(Interested German-speaking readers can click here to order The Hidden Records book from amazon.de )
Watch this space for more developments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Digitally Reconstructed Images
|
|
|
|
|
‘MISSING’ PYRAMIDS AT GIZA DISCOVERED… ON AN OLD MAP!
|
A NEW recently revealed pyramid/star correlation theory for Giza can now be proven conclusively. Wayne Herschel - the proponent of the new hypothesis - has just found the remaining missing pyramids that will make his theory conclusive. |
|
His ‘missing pyramid hypothesis’ was first mentioned in his book, ‘The Hidden Records’, which has recently been published. The author made this invaluable breakthrough while setting out to prove author Robert Bauval’s much acclaimed theory that the three pyramids of Giza correlate with Orion’s ‘belt’. |
|
|
|
However, he proposes an entirely new star map interpretation to Bauval’s, using a completely new layout scale for the Orion constellation as a whole (which leads to the inclusion of the all important Taurus constellation alongside it). This new scale interpretation displays some very ingenious mathematical adjustments (explored in the book) that must have been made intentionally by the pyramid builders, and speaks of an incredibly advanced very early civilisation. |
|
Not only does this new scale provide the answer for so many of the objections scholars have come up with… BUT IT HAS BECOME INSTRUMENTAL IN CONFIRMING WHAT APPEAR TO BE FOUR UNRECOGNISED PYRAMID RUINS AT GIZA! Discovering these elusive ‘ruins’ has also enabled the author to crack a decipherable message, which is key to unlocking the prime reason as to why the ancients built such an elaborate pyramid star map in the first place! |
|
Wayne, with many years experience in astronomy and familiarity with star maps, could see why astronomers were not completely convinced with the model Bauval proposed for his overall pyramid/star correlations (see below). This star map identified two pyramids at quite a distance from Giza (Abu Rawash in the north and Zaweyet Al Aryan in the south) to represent two of the Orion periphery stars (Saiph and Bellatrix). |
|
Although there seemed to be fairly similar distances and angles between the pyramids and the stars they were supposed to represent, one could not help observing that Bauval had no counterparts for the two brightest periphery stars of Orion. (See yellow question marks in the map below). But the biggest doubt in this model was the difference in scale when it came to comparing the size of the Orion’s ‘belt’ stars with the size of the three main pyramids at Giza. |
|
Academics have also recently pointed out that if the pyramids had been built to represent stars in a grand design so to speak, why would their builders not have included earlier pyramids - the pyramids at Saqqara and Abusir - as part of a star map? One has to query the inevitable here: What if there is a whole new interpretation that answers all these questions? And if so, would it reveal an age old secret behind the pyramids? |
|
|
|
It was this prime question that inspired Wayne Herschel to dig deeper. Given the huge distance between the Giza ‘belt’ pyramids and the closest pyramids neighbouring them (in the north Abu Rawash and in the south Zaweyet Al-Aryan), he could not help thinking that completely different stars were at play in this pyramid star map. What if two far more significant stars, namely Sirius and Aldebaran, were to fit here as the correct correlations for these two pyramids? |
|
After all, the ancient Egyptians revered Sirius as very important and the name given to the star Aldebaran was “Ad-Dab-aram”, which means “follower of the Pleiades”. (This is because if one were to follow one’s line of sight from Orion’s belt through Aldebaran, one’s eye would follow directly to the Pleiades in the night sky). Quite uncannily, the name even sounded like the pronunciation of the ancient pyramid name “Zaweyet Al-Aryan”. What if there was a connection here? And could it be that the Pleiades (part of the constellation Taurus) also somehow fitted into the picture? |
|
This could easily be tested and if it turned out to be right, the size of the Giza pyramids would most likely match the size of the three stars making up Orion’s ‘belt’… exactly! |
|
|
Wayne Herschel’s quest was further fuelled by one of the earliest Egyptian texts. The Thoth Prophecy claims the ultimate corroborating truth: |
|
“Egypt is the image of the heavens… the whole Cosmos dwells here”. |
|
“Whole” being the operative word! This very conspicuous clue suggested to him that a much wider interpretation of stars in the night sky was at play and that in all likelihood a whole 360° revolution of the Milky Way (of which Orion and Taurus form a part) was being replicated in the pyramid star map of the ancients. It was a possibility that had been entirely overlooked by Egyptologists, and it would leave him no peace. He was determined to find out if there was an astronomical solution to the grand master plan that was apparently at work in how the ancients had laid out their pyramid field. To do this, he created a series of transparencies of the stars. |
|
The astronomical scale was adjusted so that Orion’s ‘belt’ would coincide with the sizes the three main pyramids at Giza. The transparency was placed over one of the most credible ancient pyramid maps. The result was breathtaking. What emerged was a series of very accurate correlations for the most prominent stars in Taurus. (Orion is located alongside the sacred bull of the ancients…Taurus). |
|
But there was still something missing. Wayne was perplexed as to why there did not appear to be any correlations for the four important outer stars that comprise Orion: |
|
“Although this new correlation seemed to feel right, I felt very sure there must be correlations at least for the two brightest stars of Orion (that were left out of Bauval’s model).” |
|
“A trip to Giza soon solved this lingering doubt. As I gazed over the plateau from the Sphinx, there it stood right in front of my very eyes. It appeared to be one of my missing pyramids… in all its grandeur! A forgotten ‘pyramid ruin’! It had a vast causeway, which all this time scholars thought was the ruin of a wall! The ‘pyramid ruin’ is so massive that it defies all logic as to why no historian to date has interpreted it to be a ruin! I could hardly keep the camera still as I photographed ‘my’ incredible finding (see below).” |
|
|
|
|
|
Note how the middle area of the ‘ruin’ seems to have collapsed. The debris is literally the same size as the pyramid blocks at Giza. Is this ‘engineered’ bedrock that was once the base ruin of a pyramid, or are these real blocks? Note also the rear of the Sphinx (the vantage point from which the picture was taken) and the eroded walls that have been said to be over 10,000 years old, dating back to an epoch when rain fell in this area. |
|
This is when the author decided he needed an aerial image of Giza. There was only one option… an image from a hot air balloon, and that is exactly what happened. He recalls how frustrated he was with the result. The area had changed considerably over time with roads, a cemetery and building developments almost cancelling out what the area must have looked like in ancient times. But this would not deter him. |
|
What he did with the photograph was to remove all the anomalies that his research told him had been built in the last one thousand years or so. The processed image that resulted from his efforts was remarkable and it has been published in ‘The Hidden Records’ as the first colour overhead image of how Egypt once looked, at the time of Napoleon arriving in Egypt. The new image clarified that in all likelihood this was a pyramid ruin. This could be further confirmed by it aligning exactly with one of the Orion stars. |
|
|
But what really had the author puzzled, was that this ‘ruin’ had been built two thirds closer to the three main Giza pyramids, when compared to the distances of the star in question in relation to the ‘belt’ stars. The author’s book, ‘The Hidden Records’, goes to great lengths to reason this peculiarity, and comes up with some very thought provoking explanations, which once again goes to show how ingenious the pyramid builders really were. |
|
But what about the three other outer pyramids that would complete the star map? What could be lurking under the desert sand? The search was on once again… but this time for an antique map of Giza by one of the earliest cartographers. |
|
The author tracked down a map that was well over 100 years old which would give him a more accurate idea of what the plateau would have looked like in ancient times. It resulted in a fantastic breakthrough. It turned out that there were four anomalies exactly in position for all four of the outer stars of a ‘two thirds reduced’ Orion. (The author gives a comprehensively illustrated explanation of the very obvious reasons behind this differential in distance scales). Note that an altered scale depiction for the distance of the periphery stars has been introduced into the astronomical image below, for realistic comparative purposes for ‘ruin’ positions and the apparently intentional improved mathematical portrayal of these important stars. (Note how the intersecting alignment lines in red all intersect at one finite point… is this just another coincidence?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As already mentioned earlier, even Taurus (ostensibly the most important to the ancients according to all their texts) fits into this new model? It too has its pyramid counterparts on the ground! Not only did the author’s transparency test reveal such correlations, but it also included numerous others beyond Taurus and Orion… including the oldest Egyptian pyramids found at Memphis. |
|
In an infinitely important breakthrough, it turns out that the star map that emerged from Wayne Herschel’s transparency experiment included very accurately all the brightest stars alongside the Milky Way in one complete 360° revolution. This is exactly what the ancient Egyptian text of Thoth claimed. |
|
Here is the final NEWLY ADJUSTED image in support of his theory. Notice how his correlations differ from the model proposed by Robert Bauval, as seen on the top of this web page. Wayne has overcome all the previous objections proposed by scholars, all of which are detailed in the book. After all… pyramids must be built on bedrock and not sand and the code of mathematics seems to take slight precedence over precise stellar positions. All of this is on debate in the book. |
|
|
|
|
The reasons for the altered scales and why Giza is aligned the way it is, is meticulously unravelled in the book. Also how the Da Vinci codex fits into the Giza layout… where the ‘fingerprint of humanity’ literally shows the way to a measurable nearby Sun-like star in the sky… the star that Egypt and many other ancient civilisations all claimed to be the star… of the ‘gods’! (This is the prime theme of the book). This pattern is also matched on the ground… with a correlating ‘Sun-like’ temple… the ‘Sun-like’ star temple of ‘Ra’. |
|
But what about the missing pyramids at Saqqara, and Dashour that have not yet been included in the new star map theory? Are there accurate star correlations for these? |
|
The answer is yes again… there are accurate correlations with the brightest stars that remain in completing one full side of the Milky Way! A very logical yet simple message can be decoded in this star map. It isolates one pyramid/star correlation that qualifies as the proverbial ‘x’ on the star map. |
|
See the remainder of the Egyptian star map that is shown only in thumbnail size. (Click on the Star Map web page link shown earlier). The full size is depicted in the book with some interesting proof why the bent pyramid… is bent! |
|
Click here to see the thumbnail preview of the balance of the star map evidence. The whole of Lower Egypt represents one complete revolution of one side of the Milky Way… all for the purpose of one reason, and one reason only. |
|
This new pyramid star map interpretation has been aired recently on a South African television documentary and various radio interviews and the latest findings on this news release have been sent to universities all over the world to evaluate. Scholars are not prepared to comment yet, but undoubtedly will feel compelled to make a statement in the near future. |
|
Any research website, magazine or news media wanting to use this general text and images as an article, can contact the author at thrbooks@gmail.com to obtain authorisation for official usage. Conditions for use thereof will include mention of the author, the book title and the website (either a direct link or HTML address if the article is not on the web. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cuando todo parecía que Robert Bauval había encontrado la solución al enigma de las pirámides egipcias con su revolucionaria teoría de Orión, señalando que estos monumentos reconstruían el cielo de la meseta correspondiente al 10500 a. de C., todo daba un nuevo giro a la investigación. Pasan los años, y el tiempo sigue dando la razón a Bauval.
Robert Bauval, ingeniero de profesión, caminaba entre las salas del caótico Museo Egipcio de El Cairo. Un paseo más entre los muchos que había dado por el mismo lugar recordando el glorioso pasado que hace miles de años iluminó el fértil Valle del Nilo. Sobre una de las paredes de la sala que alberga la impresionante estatua en diorita del faraón Kefrén (ca. 2550 a. de C.), Bauval se percató de la existencia de una gran fotografía aérea que mostraba los vértices de las tres pirámides de la meseta de Gizeh, las de Keops (ca. 2575 a. de C.), Kefrén y Micerinos (ca. 2500 a. de C.). Parecía insólito, pero era la primera vez que se percataba de la existencia de esta inmensa fotografía, que tomada por la fuerza aérea egipcia en la década de los años 50.
Desde esa vista cenital, era mucho más claro que las tres mastodónticas construcciones no estaban alineadas, sino que la más pequeña de todas, la que pertenecía al faraón Micerinos, se desviaba de la diagonal que unía a sus dos hermanas mayores. “El desvío se notaba tanto como un cuadro torcido en una pared -comentó el propio Bauval-”. Este singular encuentro cambiaría radicalmente la vida de este ingeniero angloegipcio.
Poco después, mientras desarrollaba su trabajo en Arabia Saudí, alcanzó su descubrimiento más importante. Era una noche de verano cuando Bauval y su familia, acompañados de unos amigos, decidieron salir al desierto de las afueras de Riyad para disfrutar de la temperatura agradable de una noche estival. Fue entonces cuando, mirando al cielo, Bauval realizó uno de los descubrimientos más importantes de este siglo, hallazgo que dejó boquiabierta, incluso, a la más ortodoxa egiptología. Y es que, sorprendentemente, la estructura que poseían las tres estrellas que componen el cinturón de la constelación de Orión, era exactamente idéntico a la configuración de las tres pirámides de la meseta de Gizeh. Corría el año 1983 y todo no había hecho más que empezar.
Comienzo de una odisea
Este hallazgo, aparentemente trivial, arrastró a Bauval a una sucesión de acontecimientos que ni él mismo esperaba; casi una década de trabajo dedicada a la investigación para intentar resolver uno de los misterios más penetrantes de la Antigüedad: ¿por qué se construyeron las pirámides y qué significado tenían estos monumentos para los antiguos egipcios? El primer adelanto de su trabajo fue expuesto al público especializado en 1989, cuando escribió para la prestigiosa revista egiptológica londinense Discussions in Egyptology, un artículo que llevaba por título "A master-plan for the three pyramids of Giza based on the configuration of the three stars of the belt of Orion" ("Un plan maestro para las tres pirámides de Giza, basado en la configuración de las tres estrellas del cinturón de Orión"). Este primer paso dentro de la egiptología tradicional le sirvió para obtener el respeto y la admiración de egiptólogos tan prestigiosos como I. Eiddon S. Edwards del Museo Británico de Londres (1909-1996) o Jaromir Malek de la Universidad de Oxford. El fruto de su trabajo fue vertido en un libro que en poco tiempo se convirtió en un auténtico bestseller, y que llevaba por título El Misterio de Orión (Emecé, Barcelona 1995).
De demostrarse la certeza de la teoría de Bauval, podría considerarse como una de las pruebas definitivas que relacionaran, al fin de manera científica, las misteriosas construcciones piramidales egipcias con una función astronómica específica. Pero no sólo vincula la construcción de los monumentos de Gizeh con el cinturón de Orión, sino que añade otras relaciones no menos impresionantes que abarcan otras pirámides de Egipto con otras estrellas de nuestro firmamento Para demostrar su hipótesis, Bauval ha hecho acopio de multitud de pruebas arqueológicas y documentales. Según la teoría de este ingeniero angloegipcio, la Gran Pirámide de Keops estaría identificada con la estrella Zeta Orionis también llamada Alnitak. La pirámide de Kefrén sería la estrella Epsilon Orionis o Alnilam. Finalmente, la tercera de las pirámides de la meseta de Gizeh, la de Micerinos, estaría vinculada a Delta Orionis, denominada en ocasiones Mintaca. Para encuadrar perfectamente las posiciones de las construcciones terrestres con las estrellas de Orión, muy acertadamente Bauval invirtió la polaridad Norte-Sur de un mapa convencional moderno, colocando el Sur al Norte y viceversa, de acuerdo a la noción del mundo que tenían los antiguos egipcios y otros pueblos de la Antigüedad.
Un descubrimiento asombroso
Pero el increíble hallazgo de Bauval no se quedó en una simple relación de parecidos entre unas construcciones terrestres y la posición de una serie de estrellas de nuestro firmamento. Eso no fue más que el comienzo de una gigantesca investigación que le ayudó a encontrar otra serie de pruebas que respaldaran sus hipótesis. ¿Cómo reaccionó Bauval cuando se percató de que los mal llamados canales de ventilación de las cámaras de la Gran Pirámide de Keops estaban orientados hacia unas constelaciones y entre ellas a la propia Orión? Este descubrimiento, que ya fue anunciado por el arquitecto y también egiptólogo A. Badawy en los años 60, no hizo más que confirmar las sospechas de nuestro ingeniero. Ayudado de un potente programa informático -el skyglobe 3.5.-, Bauval pudo observar que en la supuesta época en la que se construyeron las pirámides (ca. 2500 a. de C.) existían una serie de vínculos astronómicos que, a ciencia cierta, no tenían nada que ver en absoluto con la casualidad. Así, el canal Norte de la llamada Cámara del Rey de la Gran Pirámide estuvo orientado en esta fecha hacia la estrella alpha de la constelación del Dragón, también llamada Tuban, y que en la Antigüedad hacía las funciones de estrella polar para marcar el Norte. El canal Sur de esta misma Cámara del Rey, estuvo orientada hacia la estrella Zeta Orionis, es decir, aquella que se identificaba con la propia pirámide de Keops.
Por su parte, los canales de la Cámara de la Reina, estancia ubicada inmediatamente debajo de la del Rey, también ofrecieron sorprendentes descubrimientos a nuestro investigador. El canal Norte estuvo orientado en esta fecha hacia la Osa Menor y el Sur hacia la estrella Sirio, la más brillante de la constelación del Can Mayor, y una de las más importantes del panteón egipcio, ya que era identificada con la diosa Isis, esposa de Osiris. Según Bauval, ayudado por su programa informático, el único momento en el cual pudieron darse estas circunstancias arqueológicas debió de estar entre los años 2475 y 2400 a. de C., datación que puede acomodarse con ciertos matices a la fecha que la egiptología tradicional propone para el reinado de Keops -recordemos, entre el 2589 y 2566 el a. de C. El entorno arqueológico de la meseta de Gizeh también favorecía la suposición de este ingeniero angloegipcio. Y es que, la ubicación de las tres pirámides al Oeste del río Nilo coincidía con la situación de la constelación de Orión al Oeste de la Vía Láctea, lugar identificado por los antiguos egipcios con el idílico Duat, una especie de "Paraíso" adonde iban a parar después de renacer tras la muerte.
Pruebas documentales
No solamente es la arqueología la que parece dar la razón a la teoría de Bauval. También, un estudio crítico de varios textos funerarios egipcios pareció reafirmar sus planteamientos. Entre las pruebas documentales manejadas por este ingeniero se matizan las relaciones existentes entre la constelación de Orión y su homónimo dentro de la religión egipcia, el dios Osiris. Esta circunstancia aparece perfectamente reflejada en los llamados Textos de las Pirámides. La finalidad de estos textos, escritos sobre las paredes de algunas pirámides de las V, VI y VII dinastías, no es más que la de proponer un compendio de fórmulas mágicas que tuvieran la función de ayudar al faraón, una vez muerto, en su tránsito por el Más Allá y facilitar su transformación en ntr, una especie de divinidad o ser superior. Estos documentos epigráficos son los más antiguos antecesores del famoso Libro de los Muertos de los antiguos egipcios.
A todo este batiburrillo teológico habría que añadir algún comentario a la identificación que hacían los habitantes del Valle del Nilo entre Osiris y Orión e Isis con Sirio, divinidades emparentadas en la mitología egipcia por medio del matrimonio, y muy relacionadas con las constelaciones a las que apuntan los canales de las cámaras de la Gran Pirámide. ¿Nos encontramos ante algo más que una suposición teórica al vincular la meseta de Gizeh con su homónimo estelar, el cinturón de la constelación de Orión?
Más allá de Gizeh
Sin embargo, estos descubrimientos no han quedado huérfanos en la meseta de Gizeh, sino que se han expandido a otras pirámides de Egipto. Así, Bauval defiende la posibilidad de que el gigantesco proyecto constructivo no se restringió al cinturón de Orión sino que se expandió a otras estrellas de la misma constelación hasta construir ésta sobre la tierra. Por ejemplo, la pirámide del faraón Djedefre (ca. 2475 a. de C.), sita en la cercana localidad de Abou Rowash, estaría identificada en el espacio con la estrella Kappa Orionis, también llamada Saiph. También, la pirámide de Nebka (ca. 2530 a. de C.), en la región de Zauyet el Aryan, sería la estrella Gamma Orionis o Bellatrix. Según esta hipótesis quedarían por descubrir en el Valle del Nilo las pirámides que desempeñaban el papel terrestre de las estrellas Alpha, Beta y Lambda Orionis, con las que se completarían las ocho grandes estrellas de la constelación de Orión. A comienzos de 1998 un equipo de investigadores británico comenzó la tarea, hasta ahora infructuosa, de la búsqueda de estas nuevas pirámides.
Para poner un broche de oro a tan fascinante teoría, Bauval extendió su estudio a otros grupos monumentales, relacionándolos con otras estrellas que no fueran de la constelación de Orión. La posición, por ejemplo, de la pirámide de Esnofru en Dashur con respecto a la meseta de Gizeh ha sido vinculada con las Híadas, más en concreto con 311 Tauri y Aldebarán, siendo ésta última la estrella que fue colocada por los egipcios sobre la mano de la representación iconográfica de Orión. En el colmo de la “casualidad”, la teoría de Bauval acaba por confirmar la vieja sospecha que tenían los egiptólogos hace tiempo cuando se intuía que los antiguos egipcios identificaban la Vía Láctea con su río Nilo. Efectivamente, así es, y tal como ocurre en el cielo como en la Tierra, tanto Gizeh como Orión acaban teniendo la misma estructura.
El horizonte de Leo
Hasta este punto, la Egiptología más ortodoxa no tuvo apenas reparos para, al menos, tener en consideración esta teoría. Sin embargo, las investigaciones de Bauval no se detuvieron en este punto y fueron más allá. Si el programa informático decía que la fecha del 2475 a. de C. era excelente para identificar Gizeh con la constelación de Orión y la orientación de los mal llamados canales de ventilación de las cámaras del Rey y de la Reina en la Gran Pirámide, pronto Bauval se dio cuenta de que había una fecha mejor: el 10500 a. de C. Dos años después de publicar su primer bestseller, Robert Bauval en comunión con otro mago de lo insólito, Graham Hancock, sacaban a la luz El Guardián del Génesis (Planeta-Seix Barral, Barcelona 1997). Tomando en esta ocasión como eje de su investigación la Esfinge de Gizeh y la Gran Pirámide, Bauval especulaba con la posibilidad de que estos monumentos hubieran sido construidos en algún período cercano al 10500 a. de C.
Si bien en esta fecha todas las correlaciones astronómicas se daban con mayor precisión, había un último detalle que parecía dar más fuerza a la hipótesis de Orión en el XI milenio a. de C. La Esfinge de la meseta de Gizeh en esta fecha tan remota miraba exactamente hacia la constelación de Leo. El problema reside en que los egipcios de la época faraónica no veían la constelación de Leo tal y como nosotros lo hacemos. Es decir, el conjunto de estrellas que hoy identificamos con un león (cuyo origen es babilonio y muy posterior a la época faraónica) no era interpretado por los egipcios de la misma forma.
Con todo, lo más enigmático del misterio de Orión no es intentar resolver si las pirámides fueron realmente tumbas, sino ¿qué civilización de hace 12.000 años era capaz de diseñar, estructurar y construir este tipo de monumentos en el Valle del Nilo y con qué finalidad? En este sentido Bauval es claro: en aquella época no había nadie que pudiera desarrollar este plan maestro. Las pirámides son de la IV dinastía, de eso nadie duda. La interrogante está en por qué los egipcios del 2500 a. de C. quisieron representar el cielo del 10500 en la meseta de Gizeh.
EL AUTOR es licenciado en Historia Antigua por la Universidad de Valladolid. Ha escrito más de una decena de libros asi como también más de 300 artículos en diferentes publicaciones especializadas en arqueología y enigmas históricos. Es en la actualidad director de la Revista de Arqueología, y director y presentador del programa de televisión Enigmas y Misterios. Ha colaborado también en gran cantidad de programas de radio y de televisión
www.nachoares.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. ORION (The Coming Prince) Light breaking forth in the Redeemer
29. Orion (the Glorious One)
This picture is to show that the coming one is no mere animal, but a man: a mighty, triumphant, glorious prince.
He is so pictured in the ancient Denderah Zodiac, where we see a man coming forth pointing to the three bright stars (Rigel, Bellatrix, and Betelguez) as his. His name is given as Ha-ga-t, which means this is he who triumphs. The hieroglyphic characters below read Oar. Orion was anciently spelt Oarion, from the Hebrew root, which means light. So that Orion means coming forth as light. The ancient Akkadian was Ur-ana, the light of heaven.
Orion is the most brilliant of all the constellations, and when he comes to the meridian he is accompanied by several adjacent constellations of great splendour. There is then above the horizon the most glorious view of the celestial bodies that the starry firmament affords; and this magnificent view is visible to all the habitable world, because the equinoctial line (or solstitial colure) passes nearly through the middle of Orion.
ARATUS thus sings of him:
"Eastward, beyond the region of the Bull, Stands great Orion. And who, when night is clear, Beholds him gleaming bright, shall cast his eyes in vain To find a Sign more glorious in all heaven."
The constellation is mentioned by name, as being perfectly well known both by name and appearance, in the time of Job; and as being an object of familiar knowledge at that early period of the world's history. See Job 9:9; 38:31, and Amos 5:8 (Heb. Chesil, which means a strong one, a hero, or giant).
It contains 78 stars, two being of the 1st magnitude, four of the 2nd, four of the 3rd, sixteen of the 4th, etc.
A little way below i (in the sword) is a very remarkable nebulous star. A common telescope will show that it is a beautiful nebula. A powerful telescope reveals it as consisting of collections of nebulous stars, these again being surrounded by faint luminous points, which still more powerful telescopes would resolve into separate stars.
Thus beautifully is set forth the brilliancy and glory of that Light which shall break forth when the moment comes for it to be said, "Arise, shine, for thy light is come."
The picture presents us with "the Light of the world." His left foot is significantly placed upon the head of the enemy. He is girded with a glorious girdle, studded with three brilliant stars; and upon this girdle is hung a sharp sword. Its handle proves that this mighty Prince is come forth in a new character. He is again proved to be "the Lamb that was slain," for the hilt of this sword is in the form of the head and body of a lamb. In his right hand he lifts on high his mighty club; while in his left he holds forth the token of his victory--the head and skin of the "roaring lion." We ask in wonder, "Who is this?" and the names of the stars give us the answer.
The brightest, a (in the right shoulder), is named Betelgeuz, which means the coming (Mal 3:2) of the branch.
The next, b (in the left foot), is named Rigel, or Rigol, which means the foot that crusheth. The foot is lifted up, and placed immediately over the head of the enemy, as though in the very act of crushing it. Thus, the name of the star bespeaks the act.
The next star, g (in the left shoulder), is called Bellatrix, which means quickly coming, or swiftly destroying.
The name of the fourth star, d (one of the three in the belt), carries us back to the old, old story, that this glorious One was once humbled; that His heel was once bruised. Its name is Al Nitak, the wounded One. * Similarly the star k (in the right leg) is called Saiph, bruised, which is the very word used in Genesis 3:15, thus connecting Orion with the primeval prophecy. Like Ophiuchus, he has one leg bruised; while, with the other, he is crushing the enemy under foot.
* The star z (in the belt) is called Mintaka, dividing, as a sacrifice (Lev 8:2).
This is betokened by other stars named Al Rai, who bruises, who breaks (as in Cepheus); and Thabit (Hebrew), treading on.
Other (Arabic) names relate to His Person: Al Giauza, the branch; Al Gebor, the mighty; Al Mirzam, the ruler; Al Nagjed, the prince; Niphla (Chaldee), the mighty; Nux (Hebrew), the strong. Some names relate to His coming, as Betelgeuse and Bellatrix, as above; Heka (Chaldee), coming; and Meissa (Hebrew), coming forth.
Such is the cumulative testimony of Orion's stars, which, day after day, and night after night, show forth this knowledge. That testimony was afterwards written in the Book. The Prince of Glory, who was once wounded for the sins of His redeemed, is about to rise up and shine forth for their deliverance. Their redemption draweth nigh; for--
"The LORD shall go forth as a mighty man, He shall stir up jealousy like a man of war; He shall cry, yea, roar; He shall prevail against His enemies. I have [He says] long time holden my peace; I have been still, and refrained myself: Now will I cry like a travailing woman; I will destroy and devour at once." Isaiah 42:13, 14
Then it will be said to His people (and the setting of the prophecy in its beautiful introverted structure shows us the beauty and glory of the truth it reveals): *
a: Arise, b: Shine; for thy light is come, c: And the glory of the LORD is risen upon thee. d: For, behold, the darkness shall cover the earth, d: And gross darkness the people; c: But the LORD shall arise upon thee, and His glory shall be seen upon thee. b: And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, a: And kings to the brightness of thy rising. (Isaiah 60:1-3)
* Note that-- In a and a, we have the rising of Israel; In b and b, the light that is come upon her; In c and c, the glory of the LORD; and In d and d, the darkness of the world.
This is "the glory of the God" which the heavens constantly declare (Psalm 19:1). They tell of that blessed time when the whole earth shall be filled with His glory (Num 14:21; Isa 11:9); when "the glory of the LORD shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together" (Isa 40:5), as all see now the beauty of Orion's glory.
But side by side with the glory which the coming Light of the world shall bring for His people, there is "that wicked," whom the Lord "shall destroy with the brightness of His coming." Hence, as in the concluding chapter (4) of the First Book (of which this Third Book is the expansion) we had in LYRA (the harp), as 1, Praise prepared for the Conqueror; and in ARA (the burning pyre), as 2, consuming fire prepared for His enemies: so in the first chapter of this book, we have in ORION, as 1, Glory prepared for the Conqueror; and in ERIDANUS, as 2, the River of wrath prepared for His enemies. This brings us to--
http://www.levendwater.org/books/witness/chap31.htm |
|
|
|
16:19 Y a ti te daré las llaves del reino de los cielos; y todo lo que atares en la tierra será atado en los cielos; y todo lo que desatares en la tierra será desatado en los cielos.
Job 38:31: ¿Podrás tú atar los lazos de las Pléyades, O desatarás las ligaduras de Orión?
|
|
|
Primer
Anterior
10 a 24 de 204
Siguiente
Último
|